PC 02/17/81 - Laserfiche WebLink

RZ-80-15, City of Pleasanton Application of the City of Pleasanton to prezone an approximately 43 acre site located approximately 830 ft. south of the existing City limit line between Foothill Road and I-680 to any zoning district consistent with the Low Density Residential designation of the General Plan. A negative declaration of environmental impacts will also be considered; PUD-80-16, Meyer Properties, Inc. Application of Meyer Properties, Inc. for planned unit development (Industrial and Commercial) zoning and develop- ment plan approval for an approximately 82 acre site located at the nortnwest corner o= t~opyara xoa The tentative proposal for land uses f indicates approximately 36 acres of in 24 acres of office development and 11 mercial development to be served by 11 streets. As part of the office land u stories in height and two buildings 8 proposed. The property is currently z Development (General Industrial). The may recommend approval of the rezoning as proposed or may modify the proposal sistent with the General Plan. A nega environmental impacts will also be con i and Stoneridge Drive. ~r the subject area iustrial development, acres of other com- acres of dedicated ~e, one building 14 stories in height are ~ned Planned Unit Planning Commission and development plan in any manner con- :ive declaration of ~idered; and PUD-81-2, Farmers Insurance Group Application of Farmers Insurance Group for a PUD (Planned Unit Development-Commercial and Offices) site plan and architectural approval for an approximately 150,000 sq. ft., five-story office building on an approximately 14 acre site located on Dublin Canyon Road and the west side of Foothill Road, near the intersection of I-580. A negative declaration of environmental impacts will also be considered. MATTERS INITIATED BY MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION Commissioner Getty stated she and Chairperson Wilson recently attended the League of California Cities Planning Commissioners conference in Sacramento. She said this was a worthwhile conference as it was very enlightening. Mr. Harris stated the City Coun~ a date of February 25, 1981 was meeting. Commissioners Doherty informed of this date and asked that the City Council offered a date set and that this date was noon of 2/17/81. ail desired to have a joint meeting and the date most people could attend this and Getty stated they had just been why. Mr. Walker, City Manager, stated couple of dates and the 25th was the only established late in the after- -3-