PC 02/17/81 - Laserfiche WebLink

Street Improvements No. 2 Condition No. 2 (Type A) should be revised to read as follows: "A forty-four foot (44') wide curb-to-curb street with a marked centerline, and with six (6") inches from curb to......" Street Improvements - Condition No. 3 The curb-to-curb width of B Court should be revised from 48 ft. to 44 ft. Grading - Condition No. 2 This condition should be revised to read as follows: "That the minimum grade for gutter flowlines for the public streets within this development be set at 0.5~ or as otherwise required and approved by the City Engineer. The public hearing was opened. Dave Brown, Reynolds and Brown, addressed the Commission stating he agrees with the points recommended by staff with one exception con- cerning the dimensions of the property where it intersects Meyer's property. He stated it should be 300 ft. and not 240 ft. (as shown in condition number 8). Mr. Warnick stated it was immaterial to the staff and the staff has suggested on several occasions that Reynolds and Brown get together with the Meyer people to agree on this matter and no one has moved toward agreement. He said staff just wants the two developers to be in accord on the matter. Chairperson Wilson asked the location of the area in question. The architect for Reynolds and Brown pointed out the area. Susan McKee, 4693 Denker Drive, Pleasanton, asked that this matter be continued until such time as sufficient consideration has been given to traffic, level of service and effects on Johnson/Hopyard Road inter- section and that all of the projects, i.e. Reynolds and Brown, Meyer, Prudential should be considered at one time. Paul Ebright, 5416 Blackbird, stated that Reynolds and Brown is only a part of the whole and doesn't believe the City knows what impacts this will have on life in the City and urged the matter be continued until further investigation has been accomplished. Chairperson Wilson said that he believes agreements have been entered into for necessary improvements of Johnson Drive and other improvements that are necessary through an assessment district. He stated there is a -10- . .-____._._...._ _....._._.~ _.._.. ___..„. ., .~ ....__ .. .. .. _....._._.._... ..,~......~....... .... _.. ... ~.... . ~... ....,._.... .. ..__ T .. ..~.. _...._..____._..