PC 05/13/81 - Laserfiche WebLink

Resolution No. 1981 was then entered and adopted denying application for case UP-8Q-15. The applicant was then advised they have 15 days in which to appeal this decision to the City Council. David Biasotti said that staff had told him the only reason Condition No. 3 was in the report was because it was in another case of a similar nature and that they did not have feelings on this matter one way or the other. Commissioner Doherty reiterated that he had a problem in removing Condition No. 3 of the staff report. Vice Chairperson Getty stated that the applicant can appeal Condition No. 3 of the conditional use permit to City Council. UP-81-6, Hagstrom Properties and George Cole Application of Hagstrom Properties and George Cole for a conditional use permit to operate a restricted access and/or fee parking lot on the parcel adjacent and to the south of 652 Main Street (Pleasanton Foods) now used for unrestricted local parking. Zoning for the property is C-C (Central Commercial) District. Mr. Harris presented the staff report from the previous month concerning this application. He said he did not receive a new site plan from the applicant. The public hearing was opened. Bill Hirst, 147 Bernal Avenue, spoke representing the applicant. He gave a site plan to the Planning Commission for review. He urged approval of his applicant's request, at least on a trial basis. Mr. Hirst indi- cated they would regulate Railroad Avenue entrance with the attendant and signs. Vice Chairperson Getty asked about parking fees. Mr. Hirst said there wouldn't be a per auto charge. Commissioner Lindsey asked if the basic change from the existing situation is that a booth and signs are being added. Mr. Hirst said this is true and the preclusion of the entrance from Railroad Avenue. Commissioner Jamieson asked if both entrances off of Main Street would be used and Mr. Hirst responded that they both would be used. Commissioner Jamieson said he had a problem with the two parking places on the right hand side because it would be difficult to get into and out of without having a potential hazard. Mr. Hirst said he is not even sure that striping now exists for this portion of the lot. Commissioner Jamieson then inquired about the Bianchi property and the concerns expressed by Mrs. Bianchi during the April meeting regarding hazards to her property because of the parking lot and ingress/egress from Railroad Avenue. Mr. Hirst said that by putting signs up in the parking lot concerning Railroad Avenue and having the attendant present would minimize the risk to the Bianchi property. Commissioner Jamieson said he wanted assurance that this property would be protected by the inclusion of a wheel barrier or some other device. Mr. Hirst said they would do something concerning the northeastern edge of the eastern portion of the property. -3- _..... _..'...._...._._.. _..__ _... _. . ........... ..,....._..... .. ...._.... ...~ _ _T.. ._.......