My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 12/09/81
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1981
>
PC 12/09/81
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 4:15:18 PM
Creation date
4/30/2007 8:33:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
12/9/1981
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 12/09/81
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 6 <br />Minutes <br />Planning Commission <br />Commissioner Doherty asked Mr. Lund if he was aware the Commission <br />had received a letter from Mr. Sportono. Mr. Lund said he has a <br />copy of the letter. <br />Pat Milne, 5525 San Antonio Street, Mission Park Homeowners <br />Association, spoke to the project asking that Pico be extended prior <br />to construction of improvements; that Pico Avenue be extended so <br />that it would be the main entrance and exit for the development; and <br />that the developers improve the width of the easement, provide any <br />other connectors between Sunol and the development; have construction <br />vehicles used in the development process go through Pico rather <br />than Mission Park. He indicated they realize that perhaps their <br />requests are not appropriate at the present time, but wants to <br />make sure they are involved in the process to begin with and that <br />they want to be kept notified of any discussions and desire copies <br />of all staff reports regarding this matter. <br />Commissioner Jamieson asked what the current plans are for Pico <br />Avenue. Mr. Warnick indicated there are no immediate plans to <br />connect this portion of Pico Avenue. He indicated that Mr. Milne <br />is referring to an easement from the property going north and that <br />easement would be a natural connection to Pico. <br />Commissioner Jamieson stated that .the easement is not totally <br />the Lunds and that putting a condition regarding the easement on <br />the prezoning would not be proper. Chairperson Getty stated that <br />this matter should not be considered at this time. <br />P~4r. Harris indicated the appropriate conditions have been added <br />to prezonings in the past. <br />Commissioner Wilson stated that as a developer he built streets <br />into the front portion of the Lund property in Mission Park along <br />with the sewer, water and five foot storm drain lines to serve this <br />property and the streets will handle additional traffic. He <br />said people move in a new house on a Friday and that by Tuesday <br />they are complaining about the continuous new construction in an <br />area. <br />Mr. Milne responded that they have no problem with development of <br />the land. Commissioner Wilson stated that prior to him building <br />the streets there was no way to get to the land that the City owned <br />as it was bounded by a spite zone and when he purchased the property <br />that was removed. <br />Chairperson Getty added that until it is known how the property is <br />going to be developed, it is unknown how much traffic is going to <br />be on the streets and doesn't feel this particular condition is <br />necessary at the pre zoning stage . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.