PC 02/23/83 - Laserfiche WebLink

P/C Page 8 2/23/83 63. That the developer install an asphalt sidewalk on the north side of Valley Avenue from the west property line of the development west to the Valley-Greenwood intersection to afford safe pedestrian access to Harvest Park School and to direct pedestrian traffic to controlled crossing points at Greenwood or Santa Rita to avoid mid-block crossings. 68. That except as modified by this development plan, site development standards and uses for the site shall be those of the RM-2500 District. 69. That the portion of the western fence adjacent to the one way exit drive onto Valley Avenue shall be solid masonry in construction. Commissioner Doherty said he would be happy to second the motion but he wants concrete sidewalks. Commissioner Jamieson concurred with this. Commissioner Getty then amended her motion to show Condition No. 63 as having concrete sidewalks and not asphalt as previously motioned. The amended motion was then seconded by Commissioner Doherty. ROLL CALL DOTE AYES: Commissioners Doherty, Getty, Jamieson, Arrigoni and Chairperson Lindsey NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Wilson ABSTAIN: None Resolution No. 2272 was then entered and adopted recommending approval of case PUD-83-1 as motioned. PUD-82-16, Ralph Martin et al Application of Ralph Martin et al for development plan approval for-the development of 39 parcels for single-family residential use on an approximately 42 acre parcel located on the north side of the eastern terminus of Crellin Road. Zoning for the property is PUD (Planned Unit Development)-Low Density Residential District. A Negative Declaration of environmental impacts will also be considered. Mr. Harris presented the staff report recommending approval of this project. He indicated he would like Condition No. 7 changed because as of this time there would not be any commonly owned facilities; Condition No. 20 should be deleted, Condition No. 34 modified and Condition No. 48 amended. Commissioner Jamieson asked about the second paragraph of the staff report relating to rolled curbs and Condition No. 49 relating to vertical curbs and gutters. Mr. Harris indicated that the staff has requested vertical curbing because of maintenance and drainage problems. Commissioner Jamieson asked what the drainage problems are. Mr. Warnick said they have requested vertical curbs in all except one project since he has been with the City. He said there are problems with undercutting with rolled curbs particulary in hilly areas. Commissioner Getty asked if cuts for driveways are included as a condition in this project. Mr. Martin stated that Condition No. 11 is the only reference he sees with this regard. Commissioner Getty asked if these will be custom lots how does one know where the cuts will be. Mr. Warnick explained they will end up being cut out but that the expense of rolled gutters could be considerably greater than the cost of cuts for driveways. Commissioner Getty felt that a -8-