PC 03/23/83 - Laserfiche WebLink

PLANNING COMMISSION 3/23/83 Page 7 A motion was made by Commissioner Wilson, seconded by Commissioner Doherty that the negative declaration prepared for case RZ-83-2 be recommended for approval inasmuch as the zoning proposed for the property would have an insignificant adverse effect on the environment. ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: Commissioners Arrigoni, Doherty, Jamieson, Wilson and Chairperson Lindsey NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Getty ABSTAIN: None Resolution No. 2286 was entered and adopted recommending approval of the Negative Declaration as proposed. Commissioner Arrigoni spoke to 12 and 17 foot setbacks, stating there is a big difference in these. Mr. Swift stated that all this means is that the Design Review Board may allow construction up to the property line if they so desire. Commissioner Arrigoni then asked if it is the intent of the rezoning to allow a zero lot line. Mr. Swift explained that the property is owned by the City, up for sale and that for anyone to develop it they would probably need about five variances. He indicated that Mr. Gooch made an offer on the property, but the offer was declared invalid because the offer contained stipulations that the City would grant variances for site development. A motion was made by Commissioner Wilson, seconded by Commissioner Doherty that the property described in case RZ-83-2 be recommended for rezoning from the "0" to the "C-C" District. ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: Commissioners Arrigoni, Doherty, Jamieson, Wilson and Chairperson Lindsey NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Getty ABSTAIN: None Resolution No. 2287 was entered and adopted recommending approval of the rezoning described in case R~-83-2 as motioned. Cocnnissioner Jamieson announced that in case AP-83-4 he changed his vote from Yes to No. MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S REVIEW Granny Flats Mr. Harris stated that this matter had been continued at the request of Mrs. Getty because the subject was to have been an