PC 04/13/83 - Laserfiche WebLink

PLANNING COMb1ISSI0N Page 9 4/13/83 Mr. Pinolet was concerned with the resolution of the fencing issue and as to the type of construction it would have. He stated currently homes have an open view from the rearyard. He stated he has concerns with eliminating the openess of the area and growing plantlife. He stated that there are problems now in growing things where the fencing is solid. He said the 30' buffer zone, landscaping and maintenance was done primarily for their protection. He addressed the height of the proposed buildings and that this was discussed and action taken at the time the business park was approved to protect the residences along Kolln Street. He spoke in opposition of large trucks in the business park. Chairperson Lindsey asked Mr. Pinolet about security in the area between the property lines of the homes and a fence if it should be constructed on the east side of the bermed area as it would create a 'no man's land.' Mr. Pinolet didn't feel there would be a problem. George Jensen, 1137 Kolln Street, spoke in opposition. to the proposal. He excerpted statements from the EIR originally done for the proposal when it was that of John Caroline. He read from minutes of the Planning Commission meeting approving Valley Business Park. Mr. Jensen did not want the heights of the buildings to be increased, large trucks allowed and the berming which was approved by City Council, done primarily at the request of the homeowners, to be changed. He had specific concerns with noise being generated by large trucks. He further said the heights of the buildings were restricted on the west side of the business park for the protection of the residences which border the park. Mr. Jensen elaborated each point. Mr. Jensen indicated he had talked to Brian Swift of the City Attorney's office about bonding and assessment districts for the project. He suggested also that D4r. Saltar do an acoustical analysis for the west side of the business park for the neighbors on the east side of Kolln Street paid for by Valley Business Park. He was not satisfied by the study done by Mr. Pack. .Mr. Swift reviewed his conversation with Mr. Jensen. He stated he told Mr. Jensen he would attempt to talk to Mr. Brunsell, but was not able to make contact with them. Mr. Swift stated that industrial development bonds are something he knows absolutely nothing about. He stated that, after talking to Mr. Warnick, the ability to finance the soundwall on private property would probe ably not be possible with an assessment district.