PC 05/11/83 - Laserfiche WebLink

PLANNING COMMISSION Page 11 5/11/83 Mr. Harris presented the staff report res;arding this application. The public hearing was opened. Mr. Martin Inderbitzen, 62 West Neal Street, appeared on behalf of the applicant and generally supported the staff recommendations. He did question conditions 10, 19, 20 and ?_1, which referred to suspension of use of the septic tank and mandated connection to the sewer system with construction of the appropriate improvements. He did not feel this was fair since the other properties in the area are not likely to develop and the Yee's would have the entire burden of the cost of construction. Commissi_o~.er T°Tilson suggested a possible solution of allowing one septic tank, but if the other parcels developed, all .four would be required to hook up to the sewer. Bob jJarnick indicated this was steer property with geologic problems and he has strong feelings that no more water should be added to the property therefore septic tanks are not appropriate. Mr. Inderbitzen indicated a drainage system could be constructed that would drain off more water than would be added by the septic tank. The public hearing was closed. A motion was made by Commissioner Jamieson, seconded by Commissioner Wilson, that the mitigated negative declaration prepared for the application for case MS-82-4 be recommended for approval inasmuch as conditions imposed in the project approval would reduce any significant impacts to an insignificant level. ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: Commissioners Doherty, Getty, Jamieson, ZJilson and Chairman Lindsey NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Resolution No. 2303 was entered and adopted recommending approval of the mitigated negative declaration prepared for subdivision of 51 acres into four parcels, Case MS-82-4. There was then discussion about allowing one septic tank with the provision that if any other property developed, then all four parcels would share the cost of the sewer installation. Commissioner Wilson also advised staff to look into the possibility Tom.- ........ .......... ..~..~ .....-.,_.... ..~... .... ... .... ~. „... . T.