My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 09/14/83
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
PC 09/14/83
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2017 10:24:32 AM
Creation date
4/27/2007 4:18:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/14/1983
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 09/14/83
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />September 14, 1983 <br />Page 12 <br />or the road. Chairman Jamieson stated that hopefully his <br />request to the Cuoncil will be addressed at their next meeting. <br />Commissioner Getty asked about parking on Pico Avenue. <br />Mr. Warnick said the area was changed because people were <br />parking in the bike lanes from First Street to Cork Harbour. <br />Commissioner Getty indicated it might be well when the use <br />permit is heard for the school district to consider paving <br />so that people can use the street rather than going up to <br />Angela and make that an entrance. <br />Chairman Jamieson said it is too bad that various areas can't <br />get together with their schools. San Ramon needs schools <br />and Pleasanton is closing them up for lack of enrollment. <br />Cork Harbour Development <br />Mr. Harris stated it was brought to his attention by Mr. <br />Abbrott of the Pleasanton Heights area that the house on <br />Lot 78 of Cork Harbour wasn't to be any taller than one story. <br />He stated that as a condition of the siting and design review <br />approval (March 1981) Mr. Abbrott addressed the Planning <br />Commission and mentioned the site plan of the house on Lot <br />78 being 9-1/2 to 10 feet higher than his rear yard. At <br />that same meeting a view easement was considered. Mr. Harris <br />stated that Mr. Abbrott in 1981 asked that no structure be <br />higher than elevation 448 feet. Commissioner Doherty motioned <br />that no structure should be higher than single-story on the <br />lot. He said the motion was then amended to reflect 448 <br />feet and a single-story structure. Mr. Harris explained <br />that the minutes clearly say 448 feet and a single-story <br />structure while the resolution of approval only mentions <br />448 feet. Mr. Harris indicated that the house on Lot 78 <br />is completely framed with gables going in both directions. <br />Mr. Harris stated that Chairman Jamieson asked that this <br />matter be discussed by the Planning Commission this evening. <br />Mr. Harris further stated that all lots with view easements <br />were surveyed recently by the City and one house ridge and <br />two chimneys were found to be a few inches too high. <br />Commissioner Doherty asked if Lot 78 interferes ith the view. <br />Mr. Harris stated that since they lowered the chimney it <br />doesn't encroach into the view easement. <br />Assistant City Attorney stated he would have to check on <br />the legal aspects of the discrepancy between the minutes <br />and the resolution approving the project. <br />Commissioner Wilson asked if there have been any complaints <br />Mr. Harris stated there have been several complaints but <br />it has been determined that one view easement is being encroached <br />into, but Cork Harbour will have to lower the roof line. <br />-12- <br />_ _. T. __. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.