Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />10/12/83 <br />Page 2 <br />properties at this time. He stated that at a future date, <br />he would submit a petition from the area. He further stated <br />that his suggestion is not to change the names of existing streets <br />but to look into the procedures for new projects and as an example <br />he cited the 180 units recently approved for Ponderosa Homes. <br />Mr. Hughes then discussed garrish signs put up by the developers <br />of the units behind Flair Markets along Vineyard Avenue and <br />other places in the area. He stated he checked with the City <br />and the developer has no approval for these signs. He asked <br />when the City would make them take the signs down. Mr. Hughes <br />said he had talked to Richard Glenn who said he would call and <br />take care of the matter, but at this time the signs are still <br />up. Mr. Harris responded that Mr. Glenn has in fact asked the <br />developer to take down these unapproved signs but that generally <br />the City gives a one week notice. Chairman Jamieson stated <br />that generally this type of concern is taken up with the staff <br />the end of the Planning Commission inasmuch as time is of the <br />essence generally at the beginning of the meetings. <br />REVISIONS AND OMISSIONS TO THE AGENDA <br />Mr. Harris then made the following suggested changes to the <br />agenda: 5a, case PUD-83-16, Val West to be continued to 10/26/83; <br />5b, case GP-83-8, City of Pleasanton to 10/26/83; 6f, case PUD-83-17, <br />Amador Associates to 10/26/83; and 6i, case PUD-83-20, Victor <br />Lund, Jr., et al to be continued indefinitely for revision of <br />plans. The Planning Commission concurred with these changes. <br />Commissioner Lindsey then asked about any case which is continued <br />indefinitely - would the item continue to appear on the agenda. <br />Mr. Harris stated that it would not and that it must be readvertised. <br />MATTERS INITIATED BY COMMISSION MEMBERS <br />There was none. <br />OLD BUSINESS - Public Hearings <br />PUD-83-16, Val West <br />Application o Val West, Inc. for PUD (Planned Unit Development)- <br />development plan approval of a 231 unit residential development <br />project on approximately 35 acres lotted on the north side of <br />Vineyard Avenue opposite Sauterne Way. Zoning for the property <br />is PUD (Planned Unit Development)-Medium Density Residential <br />District. A negative declaration of environmental impacts will <br />also be considered. <br />This item was continued to 10/26/83 as discussed. <br />-2- <br />