PC 10/26/83 - Laserfiche WebLink

MINUTES r, PLANNING COMMISSION 10/26/83 Page 2 GP-83-8, Cit of Pleasanton Application o the City o Pleasanton to amend the general plan land use designation from High Density Residential to Medium Density Residential, or any other designation deemed in the public interest for a 6.6 acre site located at the southwest corner of Stoneridge Drive and I-680. Zoning for the property is PUD (Planned Unit Development)-High Density Residential District. A negative declaration of environmental impacts will also be considered. This item was continued to 11/9/83 as stated earlier. PUD 83-16, Val West Application o Val West, Inc. for PUD (Planned Unit Development)- development plan approval of a 231 unit residential development project on approximately 35 acres located on the north side of Vineyard Avenue opposite Sauterne Way. Zoning for the property is PUD (Planned Unit Development)-Medium Density Residential District. A negative declaration of environmental impacts will also be considered. This matter was continued to 12/14/83 for a traffic study as stated earlier. GP-83-13, Ferreri and Miranda Application o John Ferreri and Fred Miranda to amend the general plan land use designation on approximately 6 acres located at the southeast corner of Santa Rita Road and West Las Positas Blvd. from "High Density Residential" to "Commercial and Offices." The Planning Commission may recommend any action on this matter deemed in the public interest. A mitigated negative declaration of environmental impacts was also considered. Mr. Harris presented the staff report recommending approval of the application. The public hearing was opened. John Ferreri, 865 Abbie Street, stated they concur with the staff report and would be available to answer any questions. Commissioner Lindsey asked if Mr. Ferreri had a chance to meet with the neighbors. Mr. Ferreri indicated he had met with Mr. Roquette & plans on meeting with the neighbors to deal with their concerns prior to submittal of the project. No one else addressed this issue and the public hearing was closed. A motion was made by Commissioner Getty, seconded by Commissioner Lindsey that the mitigated negative declaration for case GP-83-13 be adopted inasmuch as any potentially significant adverse environmental effects concerning this proposal would be reduced to an insignificant level by inclusion of conditions imposed on project approval. -2- __ _. ~__