My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 10/26/83
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
PC 10/26/83
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2017 10:22:46 AM
Creation date
4/27/2007 4:13:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
10/26/1983
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 10/26/83
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISISON <br />10/26/83 <br />Page 13 <br />limited future projects to Hacienda Business Park but the goals <br />and policies remain unchanged. As indicated in the staff report <br />and EIR, these goals and policies would require a general plan <br />change for any major project. Mr. Altschul said he utters the <br />concerns of other speakers against allowing unrestricted growth <br />within the City. <br />Commissioner Wilson then asked about a previous speaker's comments <br />concerning an alleged denial that Caltrans was not granted an <br />extension to have their comments addressed in the EIR. Mr. Harris <br />stated they were granted an extension. He stated they asked for <br />a one week extension initially and then a two week extension. <br />They were granted an informal one week extension. <br />Chairman Jamieson then asked Mr. Harris if a 30 day review period <br />is standard. Mr. Harris stated that a standard review period <br />would be 45 days for the response time, but that there is a provision <br />in CEQA allowing for an agency to ask for reduced review time, <br />the City asked for and was granted a reduction to 30 days. He <br />stated that Caltrans is the only agency who asked for an extension <br />of review time. <br />Mr. Tarver then stated he didn't mean to infer Caltrans' request <br />for an extension was denied. He stated he thought a reduction <br />of review time was totally inappropriate for a document of this <br />size. He stated Mr. Walker of the Clearinghouse told him that <br />perhaps he shouldn't have granted a reduction in time. Mr. Tarver <br />indicated that Caltrans is reviewing the Tri-Valley study and <br />won't be done with their review until next wewek and asked that <br />decision be continued for the result of their study. <br />Proponents <br />Jim Krause, 894 Bonita Avenue, said he was tired of everyone stating <br />how long they lived ini town. He said he grew up here and has <br />seen all of the changes. He said 4,000 homes were put on some <br />of the most fertile ground in the valley. He felt there was either <br />an attitude or philosophical problem. He disagreed that the City <br />would have development at any cost and that this opinion is borne <br />out by virtue of the development that has taken place to date. <br />He stated that the traffic needs of the community have been studied <br />by Joe Callahan in all of the reports done for the project and <br />he probably knows more about the transportation prognosis than <br />anyone else. He was pleased to have the attractive type of devleopments <br />that have been coming to the City and felt it beneifical to have <br />the opportunities of a mature City, with resources not here in <br />the past. <br />Wayne Nygren, 8034 Arroyo, said he is pleased that the Hacienda <br />Business Park has come to town and that the City has attracted <br />this kind of development. He felt that the developers are taking <br />care of the traffic concerns and the developers are not beint <br />short-sighted. He also felt that the business park had excellent <br />access to the freeways and are putting up a superior park with <br />fiscal benefit to the taxpayers. <br />-13- <br />. .. _......_.. ......._.. . r..~-._.. _. ... .~.. .. . ....~.._..... _.. .. ... .. .. ... .. .... .., .....,. _..- .. .. .T.~. . ~... .. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.