PC 11/21/83 - Laserfiche WebLink

MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION November 21, 1983 Page 9 A motion was made by Commissioner Doherty, seconded by Commissioner Arrigoni that the development agreement between the City of Pleasanton and Callahan-Pentz Properties conforms with the general plan of the City of Pleasanton and conforms to Government Code Section 65864 - 68569 and recommends that the City Council approves the agreement. ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: Commissioners Arrigoni, Doherty, Getty Lindsey and Chairman Jamieson NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Wilson ABSTAIN: None Resolution No. 2393 was entered and adopted recommending that the development agreement between the City of Pleasanton and Callahan- Pentz Properties be approved. Review of Condition No. 56 of Ordinance No. 1014 This relates to the tra is eve o service for the 91 acre site located north of Stoneridge Drive between Stoneridge Mall Road and I-680. Commissioner Lindsey announced that he had an appointment and had to leave the Planning Commission meeting. Mr. Harris presented the staff report and reasons for the recommended changes. He stated staff recommended approval of the new wording as recommended by Council and stated that this has to be reviewed by the Commission. Commissioner Doherty stated that John Innes was present at the last meeting and requested verbage be changed and the Planning Commission included their request in their motion of approval for Hacienda. He asked if the two ]evel of service conditions proposed for consideration tonight are the same or more stringent as the general plan review committee's request. Mr. Harris stated that it is the intent to treat the various properties equally and furthermore the City Council has initiated a change for Reynolds and Brown as well. Commissioner Getty stated that she has read and understands the level of service conditions covering both the 91 acre and the Meyer Business Park sites. She asked if the staff has met with Mozart and the Meyers Business Park people. Mr. Harris stated that he has met with both. Chairman Jamieson asked if this is more, less stringent than what Mr. Innes requested. Mr. Harris responded that this is what Mr. Innes wanted included. Mr. Swift stated that if asked he was sure Mr. Innes would tell him the same thing. Commissionerpoherty stated that it is only fair that everyone be treated equally. -9- _._... _ . _.,_._,._,......_......_._.__._...r..._,.. ..._ .__ __ .. ._.,-..__.___._ .. _ ._. .._-.. .. _..._.. _, __ . __ T ._ _.