My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 11/21/83
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
PC 11/21/83
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2017 10:22:20 AM
Creation date
4/27/2007 4:09:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/21/1983
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 11/21/83
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />November 21, 1983 <br />Page 3 <br />when this matter was voted on at the 10/19/83 Park and Recreation <br />Commission meeting, three members were absent. He had concerns <br />with a park on Peters Avenue because that street is a major thoroughfare; <br />the depth of the lot is such that it would be dangerous for small <br />children to use the site. He has seen three accidents in the <br />area already. When there was a park behind the police building, <br />there were always problems and felt a park on Peters Avenue would <br />also be problematic. He felt that office/business uses should <br />be allowed on the west side of Peters Avenue. <br />Paul Johnson, Real Estate Broker, Walnut Creek, works with the <br />Catholic Church properties in Pleasanton. He indicated that the <br />Church parcel at Rose/Peters is a surplus site. <br />Gregg Buckley, 420 Division Street, supported a park on the west <br />side of Peters Avenue. <br />Jocelyn Combs, 4857 Harrison Street, had her small child with <br />her stating she was living proof that there is a need for a park <br />in the area. She indicated that in most instances she has to <br />travel by automobile to take her child to a park. She felt that <br />with the zoning of the area allowing for apartments and duplexes <br />there would be more children in the area. She felt a park would <br />foster a feeling of community and allow neighbors with small children <br />to get to know, one another. <br />Ed Valin, a former Pleasanton Police Officer for 21+ years indicated <br />he is familiar with parks in the City. He felt they can cause <br />problems especially in the downtown area. He expressed sympathy <br />with the owners of a residence on Division Street which backs <br />up to the new structure on Peters Avenue. He felt this individual <br />had been deprived of privacy. He felt that a park would encourage <br />dope smoking and other problems. Apartments would have the same <br />result. Office uses usually have working hours of 8:OOam - S:OOpm <br />and are closed on the weekends. As a Detective Sargeant for 11 <br />years, he has had to deal with transients in the back of the police <br />building when it was used as a park. He said people also left <br />dogs and cats there unattended. He felt the traffic pattern on <br />Peters Avenue would not be conducive to a park. <br />Clare Wilbrandt-Koenig, 4885 Harrison Street, spoke in favor of <br />a park. She has a small child, lives in the area, and feels there <br />is a definite need for a park. Concerning vagrants, she felt <br />they could be present any time even in a parking lot. She would <br />hope that with the Police Department so close, there wouldn't <br />be a problem. <br />-3- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.