Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />November 21, 1983 <br />Page 2 <br />OLD BUSINESS - Public Hearings <br />Discussion with the Park and Recreation Commission concernin <br />parks in the owntown area. <br />Chairman Jamieson indicated that a number of people have <br />indicated they would like to input into the discussion between <br />the two Commissions. Chairman Jamieson stated he would allow <br />this even though the discussion is considered a study session <br />and not a public hearing. <br />In addition to the Planning Commissioners, the following <br />Park and Recreation Commissioners were in attendance: Jim <br />Bruno, Jack Keegan, Jacquie Oliverius and Lance Ruckteschler. <br />Commissioners Garrigan and Cooper were not present. <br />Dolores Bengston stated that in September 1983 at the Park <br />and Recreation meeting the issue of a park in the downtown <br />area came to light. She indicated that the homeowners of <br />the area submitted a petition regarding this matter. At <br />about the same time the subcommittee of the general plan <br />review committee recommended a park in the downtown area. <br />They looked at several vacant lots on the west side of Peters <br />Avenue. Staff feels that if a park site is designated it <br />should be on the largest parcel on the southwest corner of Peters <br />Avenue and Division Street. It appears that a park at this <br />site could accommodate a play area, sitting area and casual <br />area which could be used for eating one's lunch. The Park <br />and Recreation Commission supported the staff recommendation, <br />the matter went to City Council and was referred to a review <br />of both the Planning and Park and Recreation Commissions. <br />She indicated that Delucchi and Wayside parks are not generally <br />thought of as neighborhood parks. <br />Chairman Jamieson asked Ms. Bengston if she had any idea <br />of the value of the property on Peters/Division. Ms. Bengtson <br />said it would largely depend upon the zoning. They usually <br />like to think of park property as about $51,000/acre but <br />didn't feel one could expect to get the site on Peters Avenue <br />at that price. To use park dedication fees would require <br />a reprioritization of expenditures. <br />Chairman Jamieson then asked the Park and Recreation Commissioners <br />whether or not they supported a park on Peters Avenue. They <br />stated they do support a park site on Peters Avenue. Commissioner <br />Keegan stated they prefer site "F" (refer to map in Planning <br />Commission Case GP-83-9). This location would be central <br />to the downtown area, especially in view of the fact that <br />a museum will be occupying the old police building and this <br />is the largest parcel available on Peters Avenue. <br />Larry Osborne, 1159 Kottinger, owner of the building at 699 <br />Peters Avenue, did not support a park on Peters Avenue because <br />-2- <br />