Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes <br />Planning Commissior. <br />12/12/84 <br />to external streets. Mr. Warnick indicated the condition refers <br />to internal streets. <br />The public hearing was closed. <br />Commissioner Lindsey felt the property owners of Stanley <br />Boulevard had a right to know when Del Valle Parkway is going to <br />happen. Chairman Doherty indicated he would prefer the general <br />plan be considered only for 4005 Stanley Boulevard until the City <br />decides on the Del Valle Parkway extension. <br />Chairman Doherty, Commissioners Innes and Lindsey desired to have <br />their concerns regarding the Del Valle Parkway expressed to the <br />City Council. Commissioner Inner then asked Councilmember Mohr <br />who was in the audience to reflect the Commission's views on the <br />matter. <br />Mr. Warnick explained that in the normal process of the capital <br />improvement project is for staff to look at the width, prepare <br />the environmental documents and come up with a project. At this <br />time the alignment would be thoroughly reviewed. <br />Commissioner Innes wanted the matter finalized, the EIR prepared, <br />and the alignment locked in. He felt the people have a right to <br />know precisely how they stand. <br />Commissioner Lindsey asked that if someone came into the office <br />they could be shown where the alignment would be. Mr. Warnick <br />indicated staff could show where it would be. <br />Commissioner Lindsey supported Commissioner Innes' comments. <br />Commissioner Getty felt it was ridiculous for people to be unable <br />to do anything with their properties. <br />Commissioner Inner still felt he would like the issue carried as <br />far as it can possibly go. Mr. Warnick indicated that if the <br />City had the money they would construct it as soon as possible. <br />Chairman Doherty suggested the Commission act on both of the <br />projects and then give staff some direction. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Wi <br />Commissioner Getty that the negative <br />case GP-84-14 be adopted inasmuch as <br />proposed would have an insignificant <br />and that the negative declaration of <br />recommended for approval. <br />lson, seconded by <br />declaration prepared for <br />the general plan change <br />effect on the environment <br />environmental impacts be <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES: Commissioners Getty, Innes, Lindsey, Wilson and Chairman <br />Doherty <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN:None <br />- 11 - <br />_~. .._ _. <br />_ __....._~ ...1.._,___ <br />