My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 10/24/84
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1984
>
PC 10/24/84
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2017 10:29:02 AM
Creation date
4/26/2007 4:57:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
10/24/1984
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 10/24/84
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Minutes <br />Planning Commissi. <br />10/24/84 <br />Mr. Harris presented the staff report. <br />Commissioner Wilson asked how many fences would have to be moved. <br />Mr. Harris responded that four fences would have to be moved <br />anywhere from one to three feet in some cases. Chairman Doherty <br />asked if Homestead is willing to pay for the moving of the <br />fences. Mr. Harris stated that there is landscaping and in some <br />case patios which would have to be relocated. One person has <br />cemented an area for a dog run and this would have to be removed. <br />Commissioner Wilson asked if there was any place in the City <br />where fences are closer than five feet. Mr. Harris said, "not <br />legally." <br />Commissioner Wellman pointed out that she is aware of a variance <br />which was granted within five feet. Mr. Harris indicated that <br />this was granted by he City Council and not the Planning <br />Commission. <br />Commissioner Getty stated that this project does not consist of <br />standard lots. Mr. Harris said the lots are 50 ft. wide and that <br />is why staff is recommending five ft. setbacks. <br />Commissioner Getty asked if there was any problem with siting on <br />the corners. Mr. Harris indicated that staff could not think of <br />any siting distance problems. <br />Commissioner Wilson would hate to set a precedent by granting <br />approval of this appeal. <br />The public hearing was opened. <br />Kim Jameyson, 2177 Armstrong, said her fence is four ft. from the <br />curb and therefoer she would have to move his fence nine inches. <br />She has planted grass, installed brick and patio. She did not <br />want to move the fence and cause damage to his yard. He said <br />Homestead has not been quick to respond to the problems of the <br />homeowners. Much of his yard has weeds because he didn't want to <br />finish landscaping until the fence issue was resolved. She felt <br />that if the fence was to be moved it would cause the fencing to <br />become weak. <br />Allan Cofer, 2101 Alexander, urged approval of their appeal. He <br />presented photographs showing the fencing and explained the <br />possible damage to the property if they are required to move the <br />fencing. <br />Commissioner Wilson asked staff about the setbacks for the entire <br />development. Mr. Harris explained that the entire development <br />has been built as approved, but there was no fencing shown on the <br />development plan. Homestead merely went and built the fencing. <br />If they had come to the City the City would have tried to hold a <br />five ft. setback wherever it could be done. He said perhaps the <br />lots should have been required to be wider, but these homes were <br />built as part of an affordable housing project. <br />- 8 - <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.