My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 10/10/84
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1984
>
PC 10/10/84
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2017 10:29:08 AM
Creation date
4/26/2007 4:56:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
10/10/1984
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 10/10/84
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Chairman Doherty asked about that portion of the wall which is on <br />public property. Mr. Warnick explained that a portion of the <br />wall extends into the public right-of-way to the curb. He <br />indicated that to leave a portion of the wall in the public <br />right-of-way creates a liability problem for the City. It is his <br />intention to deny the encroachment permit and the applicant can <br />then appeal this decision to the City Council. Mr. Swift <br />confirmed that to leave a portion of the wall in the public <br />right-of-way would be to put the City at risk. <br />The public hearing was opened. <br />Mr. Howe, 645 Abbie Street, presented photographs of his home and <br />wall. They moved in January. They asked the developer to <br />reorient the home and when this was done lights from vehicles <br />came right into his window. Another problem they have is that <br />people believe there is a thoroughfare roadway next to his home <br />so they enter the area going 25mph. This creates a problem also <br />for his neighbors and the wall helps reduce this problem. When <br />they built the wall they tried to make it both useful and <br />aesthetically pleasing. He does not believe that it is offensive <br />to the neighborhood. He urged the Commission to deny their <br />appeal. He expressed willingness to sign a hold harmless <br />agreement or provide whatever necessary to relieve the City of <br />liability. <br />Commissioner Innes then asked Mr. Swift the effect a hold <br />harmless agreement would have on the City and asked whether or <br />not it would remove the City from any liability. Mr. Swift <br />indicated that the problem arises when there is a lawsuit <br />involving a third party and the unknown factor as to how solvent <br />the property owner is. <br />Commissioner Getty felt many problems in the area are due to <br />people in the Pleasanton Heights area getting involved in <br />situations not involving them. She felt the wall is <br />aesthetically pleasing. She, however, did not want to jeopardize <br />the property owner or the City. <br />Commissioner Wilson asked the applicant about removing the wall <br />or a portion of it. Mr. Howe said he was advised to do <br />everything possible to have the wall retained inasmuch as it is <br />overbuilt and it would be difficult to remove. In addition it <br />was extremely expensive to construct. <br />George McGary, 668 Abbie Street, lives directly across the street <br />from the property and supports the wall. He felt it to be <br />aesthetically appealing as he looks at it every day. <br />Bill Herlihy, 816 Abbie Street, President of Pleasanton Heights <br />Homeowners Association, sympathized with the attempts to solve a <br />problem but was concerned with rules and regulations being <br />violated. He felt the City was being put in an untenable <br />situation of allowing a person to build into a City easement <br />area. Cork Harbour has done the same thing. He felt everyone <br />should be governed by the same rules. <br />- 9 - <br />_. __ _ _ _~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.