PC 10/10/84 - Laserfiche WebLink

have to take care of drainage problems. It is not necessary that the developer show this on preliminary plans. Commissioner Innes felt the first responsibility of the Commission is to the sensitive needs of Pleasanton. Commissioner Wilson made a motion seconded by CommissionerpLiidant maatmeets matter be continued to 10/24/84 so that the a p Y with the neighbors. UP 84 49, Amador Savings and Loan Application of Amador Savings and Loan for a conditional use permit to allow the establishment and operation of savings and loan office at 2911 Hopyard Road. The property is zoned CN (Neighborhood Commercial) District. Mr. Harris presented the staff report recommending approval of case UP-84-49. The public hearing was opened. The public hearing was closed. A motion was made by Commissioner Getty, seconded by Commissioner Wilson that case UP-84-49 be approved subject to the conditions shown in the staff report, eliminating Condition No. 2 because all findings as shown in the staff report are made. ROLL CALL VOTE AYES• Commissioners Getty, Innes, Lindsey, • Wilson and Chairman Doherty NOE5: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Resolution No. 2543 was entered and adopted approving case UP-84-49 as motioned. PUD-79-11-5M, City of Pleasanton Appeal of the Planning Commission of a deciaiminor modificatgon Administrator approving Case PUD-79-11-5M, to the PUD (Planned Unit Development) governing the property located at 645 Abbie Street to allow the retention of a 4' high masonry wall in the front yard of the property. The site is zoned PUD (Planned Unit Development)-Medium Density Residential District. Mr. Harris presented the staff report recommending the property owner be allowed to retain that portion of the wall which is on his own private property. Commissioner Wilson was surprised that he did not see of the neighbors to this project in the audience with the amount of telephone calls and comments robabl rscentea lotuoftmoneyaon•thHs felt the property owner had p Y P wall, - 8 - __ _ .. ~