Laserfiche WebLink
there is no marking on the outside of the project on Ray Street <br />that there is no visitor parking inside you will have cars <br />turning around and jamming up causing a traffic problem. He <br />would recommended that "visitors parking outside" be posted on <br />Ray Street. He would like to hear staff's comments on the <br />visitor parking situation. Mr. Harris stated that there isn't <br />much frontage for this piece of property so it is true there is <br />no off site parking and it could be a problem. Commissioner <br />Wilson expressed concern as to the original of the cars being <br />parked on Walnut Drive. Mr. Harris didn't know but indica~kan <br />that it is true some businesses prohibit employees from p g <br />at their facilities. Commissioner Getty stated that Ray Street <br />has more red striping on it than any other street in own. <br />Commissioner Wilson then asked Ms. Bianchi if cars are parked on <br />Walnut Drive all day long. She said they were and most likely <br />their owners walk downtown or to First Street shopping Center. <br />There is no parking on Ray Street so people park on Walnut DRive. <br />Commissioner Wilson asked if it onuWalnutp oMrs1riBianchihfeltait <br />two hour time limit for parking <br />would be a hindrance for the property. <br />Chairman Doherty supported the comments of the other <br />commissioners and announced that this matter would be continued <br />to November 14, 1984 so that the developer may work with the <br />neighbors concerning this project. He expressed resenttatmthis <br />of displeasure with WithdthelneighborsnotCommunications with the <br />meeting and working <br />neighbors is very important. <br />Chairman Doherty theborskseemhtoadisagree andhstate theyahavednot <br />contact as the neigh started six to <br />been contacted. Mr. Cassutttheageaeraltplanyamendment and <br />eight months ago concerning <br />rezoning. At that time they worked with one residenrooeCtalnHe <br />Drive who was a paralegal person and discussed lan.p He stated if <br />said it is true they have not seen the latest p <br />they do not get approval tonight they will be setback for one <br />year because of growth management. He felt trocessgandrthead <br />been contacted twice; once for the rezoning p <br />second time through the City. Plans have been in the City for a <br />at least three-four weeks and they have not heard any negative <br />comments concerning this. <br />Commissioner Lindsey asked Mr. Harris about growth management. <br />Mr. Harris stated that it is scheduled to go before City Council <br />10/30/84. This matter cHelexplainedcthat there4is anprovisiontin <br />be able to go throug <br />the growth management ordinance which requires project approval <br />30 days prior to applying for growth management. Commissioner <br />Lindsey felt that it is the responsibility of the developer to <br />communicate with the neighbors growth management not <br />withstanding. <br />Commissioner Wilson asked about the drainage concerns of Mr. <br />Cavestri. Mr. Warnick stated that final improvement plans would <br />- 7 - <br />