PC 10/10/84 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner Lindsey asked of all of the units were for rent. Mr. Cassutt indicated that they will be condominiums and for sale. Commissioner INnes then asked if Mr. Cassutt knew what the prices of the units would be. Mr. Cassutt indicated this is unknown at the current time. The public hearing was closed. Juanita Bianchi, 4105 Walnut Drive, indicated that osedaoflthent has not contacted any of the neighbors. She is oppparticularly project because of traffic concerns on Ray Street, with the parking. She felt an updated traffic count of Ray Street should be made as there hasn't been one for almost a year. Commissioner Lindsey asked Ms. Bianchi if she had any objections to the project other that parking on Walnut Drive. Ms. Bianchi reiterated that traffic is a real problem. She felt the new proposal was better than the original plan but still would create a traffic problems. Chairman Doherty expressed surprise at someone being concerned with a one percent traffic change. Ms. Bianchi explained that people park on Walnut Drive in a residential neighborhood because there is no parking on Ray Street. During the peak hours one cannot get out onto Ray Street. Chairman Doherty asked who is parking on Walnut Drive. Ms. Bianchi explained that she had lace idea where they are coming from but said parking was taking p on both sides of Walnut Drive on a bumper-to-bumper basis. She felt that traffic count was definitely obsolete. Tony Cavestri, 4126 Walnut Drive, indicated the developer has never worked with him either and had some concerns as to whether or not the developer was going to install a retaining wall, trellises, fences, etc. He had concerns with water drainage. All he wishedstcontactedaanytof theepeopleaonrWalnuteDrivesues but no one ha Dolores Rose, 141 Ray Avenue, lives next door to the proposed development. She is opposed to the project because of dust and noise. Commissioner Innes asked Ms. Rose if she has talked to the developer. Ms. Rose indicated that the developer has never contacted her. The public hearing was closed. Commissioner Lindsey felt the development was a good one but was extremely disappointed that the developer has made no contact with the neighbors to discuss the project. He recommended that the matter be continued until such time as the developer or his representative has contacted the neighbors so that they might better understand what is going to take place. Commissioner Innes agreed with Commissioner Lindsey. He also felt that the staff and the developer should address parking requirements for the 10 units. He was concerned with the circulation in the project; 1 there is a deadend entrance; two if - 6 -