Laserfiche WebLink
operation but in his opinion a drive through at this building is <br />not practical and he cannot support a drive through. <br />Commissioner Getty agrees, she doesn't like access to Santa Rita <br />Road and can't support this application for a conditional use <br />permit. <br />Commissioner Lindsey made a motion, seconded by Commissioner <br />Getty that case UP-84-31 be denied as required findings cannot be <br />made to grant approval of this application. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br />Resolution No. <br />UP-84-31. The <br />within 15 days <br />Commissioners Getty, Innes, Lindsey, <br />Wilson and Chairman Doherty <br />None <br />None <br />None <br />2518 was entered and adopted denying case <br />applicant was advised he may appeal this decision <br />to the City Council. <br />PUD-84-6, Chin/Pleasanton School District <br />Application of the Pleasanton School District and Kenneth Chin <br />for rezoning and development plan approval for a eight unit <br />residential development on an approximately .9 acre site located <br />on the north side of Abbie Street between the Old Towne <br />development and the residences on the east side of Whiting <br />Street. Zoning for the property is R-1-6500 (Single-family <br />Residential) District. A negative declaration of environmental <br />impacts will also be considered. <br />This matter was continued to 9/26/84. <br />RZ-84-10, City of Pleasanton <br />Application of the Planning Commission to amend certain sections <br />of the zoning code as they pertain to temporary subdivision and <br />real estate signs adjacent to freeways. The Planning Commission <br />may recommend any action on this matter deemed to be in the <br />public interest. <br />Mr. Harris presented the staff report. <br />Commissioner Innes asked why the proposed ordinance excluded <br />properties over 100 acres. Mr. Harris explained that there are <br />developments with over 100 acres which have larger than 100 sq. <br />ft. signs but because of the design and location they really <br />appear to be much smaller. Commissioner Innes felt that size was <br />related to design rather than acreage. <br />Commissioner Innes then asked for the City's definition of <br />'temporary'. Mr. Harris indicated that there is no City <br />definition for 'temporary'. Generally speaking, in Mr. Harris' <br />opinion temporary signs are mounted on 4'x'4s and are not <br />finished. Commissioner Innes then asked how long a subdivision <br />sign could be up. Mr. Harris indicated that subdivision signs <br />can be up one year, but there is no limit with regard to other <br />- 3 - <br />. _r- <br />