PC 08/08/84 - Laserfiche WebLink

8/8/84 Planning Commission Page 5 Tract 5229, Crocker Homes Application of Crocker Homes to subdivide the approximately 8 acre site located on the north side of Parkside Drive immediately west of the western terminus of Sutter Gate Avenue into 33 separate parcels. The property is zoned R-1-7500 (Single-family Residential) District. Mr. Harris indicated that Mr. Warnick, Director of Public Works and Utilities has distributed an amendment to the staff report changing condition number 33 and adding condition number thirty-eight. Mr. Warnick presented a review of the amended document explaining that it has come about as a result of City Council addressing emergency access to the park. The cost of improvements will be shared between Crocker Homes, Hacienda Business Park and the City. The City has met with these people and Crocker agrees to perform work related to their development for $100,000. If the work is done for less, the difference would be contributed to landscaping next to Suttergate. The front of the park would be done by Hacienda Business Park for a total of $250,000 and any funds not used would be contributed to the landscaping. Hopefully there will be about $40,000 left over between the two. This proposal will go before City Council at their next meeting. Commissionerlnnes asked if it has been determined that by improving Hopyard Road at the sports park the traffic can be handled. Mr. Warnick reported that the traffic should not get to LOS E because of the left turn lanes. Commissioner Wilson felt that the expenses should be covered in an assessment district against the existing dwelling units because he believes that Sutter Gate should be open as originally intended. Chairman Doherty had a problem with Crocker Homes and Hacienda Business Park paying for the entire improvement. He would hate to see a job not done up to the quality standards that Pleasanton has come to expect. Mr. Warnick explained that City Council has control over the quality of the development. Commissioner Wilson reiterated that he did not want to prevent forever the opening of Sutter Gate. No one can guarantee what the LOS will be and cutting Sutter Gate off totally will cause the elimination of one possible solution. Commissioner Innes had some concern with access to the sports park and pedestrian bridge across the arroyo. As it is noW the tenants of Hacienda will have to get in their cars to drive to a baseball game. The public hearing was opened. Larry Bartelson, MacKay and Somps, Concord, represented Crocker Homes. This project has been delayed for over six months because of Sutter Gate. He asked the Commission to not continue the matter again. He stated that Crocker Homes has reviewed the 37 conditions applicable to the tentative map. They do not agree with condition number 33 as stated therein, but do concur with the recommendations of the Director of Public Works and Utilities concerning the new wording and the addition of condition number 38. Chairman Doherty confirmed with Mr. Bartelson that he now agrees to the new condition number 33 and the added condition number 38. The public hearing was closed. -5- . .._ .._.__.... ......._. , . .. _._. . _..._._ ... _. _..... __.._..._.. _T..a_..,_ ... _.._~... __._.. _.. .. .. .,_.. _ .ice. _.