Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />April 11, 1984 <br />Page 9 <br />Chairman Jamieson asked the City Attorney whether or not it would be illegal <br />to modify the ordinance. The City Attorney said ordinances can legally <br />be modified through the public hearing procedure. <br />Sharrell Michelotti, 7873 Olive, co-chairman of the Transportation Subcommittee <br />of the Industrial General Plan Review Committee, indicated that their <br />committee recommended that access be studied for the eastern end of Sports <br />Park. Mrs. Michelotti then put a plan on the board for everyone to see. <br />Her plan, amongst other things, proposed access from Skylark. The more <br />access you have the fewer impacts you have on any one area. <br />Brad Hirst, 2456 Minivet, was happy to see a concensus that an additional <br />access is needed. He didn't have any problem with industrial traffic <br />and residential traffic coming together. It has happened in San Leandro <br />quite successfully. He questioned and discouraged an idea that would <br />cost $500,000-$700,000 for a bridge across the Mocho. This proposal could <br />not be supported by him. <br />Ken Scown, 2603 Laramie Gate Circle didn't believe a $500,000-$700,000 cost <br />would be too much for a bridge across an area that is not yet developed. <br />He was concerned with children in the area in the future. He also expected <br />City Council to live up to their guarantee of no vehicular access to Suttergate. <br />He asked what the normal traffic counts are on residential roads. Mr. <br />Warnick explained that there are roughly 10 vehicle trips per day per house- <br />hold. Therefore, the traffic counts would vary depending upon how many <br />streets dump into a collector and how many homes there are in the area. <br />Angie Summers, 4750 Suttergate, said the first she had heard of this matter <br />was in the Herald. She objected to Suttergate going through. <br />Randy Hickle, 2802 Jones Gate, was against Suttergate going through and <br />wanted the Council to live up to their promises and guarantees. <br />John Innes, 1586 Foothill Road, Chairman General Plan Review Committee <br />said a concensus is very difficult and that the 130 member committee couldn't <br />agree on the access either. They voted to recommend the issue be studied. <br />Emergency access is necessary especially in view of the types of sports <br />being played on the fields. <br />Jack Swanson, Prudential Insurance Company, presented their proposal for <br />all to see. He explained the impacts a Las Positas connection would have <br />on Hacienda Business Park. He reviewed the proposed extension of Stoneridge <br />Drive just approved by the City Council. The Hacienda Business Park has <br />tried very hard to mitigate traffic problems and one of the ways to do <br />this is to separate business from residential traffic. West Las Positas <br />is a high speed road and access would slow the traffic down. He said <br />the bridge proposed by the homeowners did not take into consideration <br />the cost of the land to Crocker and Hacienda. It would be in the millions. <br />-9- <br />