PC 03/28/84 - Laserfiche WebLink

Page 5 Minutes Planning Commission 3/28/84 The restaurant proposed is t e third of its kind; two of them are in the south Bay Area, i.e., Santa Clara and Palo Alto. There is also one in Los Gatos. The design of the structure is copied from structures in Mexico. He reviewed the materials t be used. Parking is 172 spaces while 87 spaces are required. The restaura t will have 300 seats. Commissioner Wilson asked a that the front courtyard pr of a restaurant before entr the restaurant in Santa Cla also noted that the weather Clara and asked if the land Enson said it was considere architect that Hacienda Bus out the exterior courtyards. Mr. Enson stated vides for a waiting area while giving the ambience nce is made. Commissioner Doherty noted that a has a waiting line at 10:30am for lunch. He is different in Pleasanton than it is in Santa taping was considered with this regard. Mr. and that is why they are using the landscape Hess Park uses. Jack Hovingh, 4250 Muirwood Drive, supported the location of the restaurant. He applauded the parking pr posed. He expressed confusion generally when attempting to park in other areas because of the size of the spaces and one is never sure whether parki g is for large or small cars. The public hearing was clos~'d. Commissioner Wilson asked R ger Gage if they were using one-half of the depth of Lot lA. Mr. Gage said t ey were and it would leave one-half of the depth for another restaurant. Co issioner Wilson asked if it was always intended to use Hopyard Road for a d iveway. Mr. Warnick said it was that there are four lanes going north and his will allow a limited number of driveways in the commercial area. Mr. Harris referred to Condi He asked that all parking s~ 16 as shown on the staff red at the Stoneridge Shopping situation, CCRs say 82 x 18' cars try to get into compact be designed either way. T1 Commissioner Wilson asked a stated that one handicap sp then reduces on a sliding s tion No. 2 relating to parking requirements. aces be 8'8" rather than as shown in Article ort. He stated that the 8'8" seem to work well enter. Mr. Gage felt this to be an interesting . They want to avoid a situation where large spaces. Mr. Enson felt that the parking could ey want to have the maximum parking on the site. out the code for handicap parking. Mr. Swift ce is required for the first 10 parking spaces ale. Commissioner Doherty commen ed that Pedros is a very classy establishment and will be a plus for Plea anton. Commissioners Lindsey and Jamieson agreed with this comment . Mr. Swift pointed out that i~he Commission's recommendation should not reflect 'per attached resolution .' It has been established that an EIR has been prepared previously for Hacienda Business Park and uses of this type were considered in that EIR. Th re is no need for the Initial Study and the Draft Resolution attached to the taff report. A condition, perhaps, should be added that approval is reco ended subject to ordinance 1109 becoming effective. -5- ~ _