My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 02/08/84
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1984
>
PC 02/08/84
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2017 10:39:43 AM
Creation date
4/24/2007 4:59:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/8/1984
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 02/08/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />February 8, 1984 <br />Page 4 <br />an insignificant effect on the environment. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES: Commissioners Doherty, Getty, Lindsey, Wilson, Doherty <br />and Chairman Jamieson <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br />Resolution No. 2427 was entered and adopted approving the negative declaration prepared <br />for case UP-83-54 as motioned. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Lindsey, seconded by Commissioner Getty that case <br />UP-83-54 be approved per the conditions of the staff report in that all required findings as <br />shown in this report are made. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES: Commissioner <br /> Jamieson <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br />Doherty, Getty, Lindsey, Wilson and Chairman <br />Resolution No. 2428 was entered and adopted approving case UP-83-54 as motioned. <br />Chairman Jamieson then announced that Preliminary Review of Tentative Tract 5229, Parks ide <br />would be addressed next. <br />Mr. Harris explained that this is for information purposes only and covers the eastern most <br />eight acres. The access on the plan is controversial since it ties in with the Amberwood project <br />on the east. He indicated that the preliminary map does show atie-in to Suttergate Avenue <br />but that a condition of the rezoninig prohibits this tie-in. At this time the critical item will <br />be the results of the traffic study being done to determine the consequences of having future <br />access only to/from Hopyard Road. Mr. Harris explained the matter will be referred to the <br />Park and Recreation Commission, Planning Commission and then on to City Council. City <br />Council does want recommendations from these Commissions. <br />PUD-83-10/12, Wagerman et al <br />Application of Wagerman, Black, Cartlidge, et al for PUD (Planned Unit Development)-development <br />plan approval for a proposed thirty-five lot low density residential project with lots ranging <br />in size from approximately 23,000 to 58,000 sq. ft. on approximately 25 acres located in the <br />general vicinity of the northwest corner of Mohr and Martin Avenues. Zoning for the property <br />is PUD (Planned Unit Development)-Low Density Residential District. A negative declaration <br />of environmental impacts will also be considered. <br />Mr. Harris presented the staff report recommending approval of the project. He indicated <br />the City has money to complete the bridge over the Arroyo Mocho. Commissioner Wilson <br />asked if this bridge was partially funded by George Oakes. Mr. Harris said it was. He explained <br />that the contribution could be used for the bridge or other public improvements in the tract <br />as determined appropriate by the City. Chairman Jamieson indicated that previously it <br />was discussed that the street might be deadended. Mr. Harris explained that Mrs. Lauer has <br />made this request. <br />-4- <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.