PC 01/25/84 - Laserfiche WebLink

Minutes Planning Commission 1/25/84 Page 8 Mr. Swift stated that persons within 100 feet would require notification in the event of a public hearing and not 300 feet as is done now. After discussion, the Planning Commission initiated an application to change the Zoning regulations with regard to childcare in residential neighborhoods and opened the public hearing. No one addressed the proposed ordinance and the public hearing was closed. A motion was made by Getty, seconded by Commissioner Lindsey that an ordinance be drafted providing for administrative review of daycare applications according to the basic standard that such operations be separated by three hundred feet from any other childcare facility; where an applicant's home is closer than three hundred feet to another childcare facility, as provided for under state law, a maximum of six children (including those residing in the home) could be cared for. ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: Commissioners Doherty, Getty, Lindsey and Chairman Jamieson NOES: Commissioner Wilson ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Resolution No. 2424 was entered and adopted recommending approval of case RZ-84-1 as motioned. UP-82-24 James Cross & Texaco, Inc. One year review of a conditional use permit to operate a service station not including the sale of gasoline at 44 Mission Drive. Zoning for the property is C-F (Commercial Freeway) District. Mr. Harris presented the staff report stating that Mr. Cross has complied with all of the conditions imposed on his use permit and that the business has been run in a clean and orderly way, including the maintenance of landscaping and surrounding areas. Commissioner Wilson felt that this application should be reviewed once a year. It would be particularly important if the business were to change hands. Mr. Harris stated that the purpose of the one year review was so that the Planning Commission would have the ability to add, delete, or modify conditi ons of the use permit at that time. Commissioner Getty didn't feel that Mr. Cross should have to come back before the Planning Commission every year. Commissioner Lindsey felt that this business should be allowed to continue for the duration of the use permit (3 additional) years as long as Mr. Cross is the owner/operator. Chairman Jamieson supported a yearly view as stated by Commissioner Wilson. Jim Cross, 821 Sylvaner, stated that he is operating his business in accordance with the conditions imposed on his use permit and stated that as far as he knows, no other business in town must have a yearly review. He stated he plans to make his career this business and with a yearly review there is always the possibility the conditional use permit could be revoked. He didn't feel this was fair. -8-