My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 09/09/85
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1985
>
PC 09/09/85
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2017 10:57:03 AM
Creation date
4/24/2007 4:39:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/11/1985
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 09/9/85
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Minutes <br />Planning Commissio <br />September 11, 1985 <br />inasmuch as approval of the General Plan amendments, rezoning and <br />development plan would have an insignificant effect on the <br />environment. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE: <br />AYES: Commissioners Hoyt, <br />Chairman Wilson <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br />Innes, Lindsey, Michelotti, and <br />Resolution No. 2700 was entered and adopted recommending approval <br />of the Negative Declaration as motioned. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Lindsey, seconded by <br />Commissioner Innes that Case GP-85-O6 be recommended for approval <br />subject to the conditions of the staff report, eliminating <br />Condition No. 1. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES: Commissioners Hoyt, <br />Chairman Wilson <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br />Innes, Lindsey, Michelotti and <br />Resolution No. 2701 was entered and adopted recommending approval <br />of Case GP-85-6 as motioned. <br />Commissioner Lindsey stated he would have liked to see the <br />resolution of the Del Valle Parkway extension situation prior to <br />consideration of this application. Mr. Swift indicated that <br />staff tried to anticipate that and this project could proceed <br />either on existing STanley or proposed del Valle Parkway with the <br />revised plan. <br />Commissioner Innes would like to see Condition No. 4 as shown in <br />the staff report for PUD-85-7 to be changed to read "That no <br />building permit for the project shall be issued until such time <br />as contracts for both the extension of Valley Avenue to Stanley <br />Boulevard and the completion of the Del Valle Parkway in front of <br />the project are let and/or the alignment of the Del Valle Parkway <br />has been determined." <br />Commissioner Lindsey then discussed off-street parking with <br />regard to this project. He asked about the requirements of the <br />CC&Rs with regard to the requirement of garage doors. Mr. Swift <br />stated that the revised plan eliminates two units and one guest <br />parking space. If people use the garages for purposes other than <br />parking, parking could be a problem. No parking will be allowed <br />on Del Valle Parkway no matter which alignment is used. <br />On-street parking is limited. Off-street parking has to be <br />eliminated. If people use their garages for parking, parking <br />will be sufficient. Staff has talked to the applicants <br />- 7 - <br />. r <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.