My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 01/23/85
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1985
>
PC 01/23/85
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2017 10:59:16 AM
Creation date
4/23/2007 4:50:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/23/1985
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 01/23/85
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Minutes <br />Planning Commissio <br />1 23 85 <br />MATTERS INITIATED BY COMMISSION MEMBERS <br />Commissioner Innes indicated that 5776 Stoneridge Mall Road had <br />37 Chrysler vehicles without license plates parked in the parking <br />lot and over 20 vehicles with dealer plates on them. Mr. Harris <br />indicated that he has talked to Imperial Freehold regarding this <br />matter and they have allowed Chrysler to park their vehicles on <br />the parking lot until such time as the balance of their space is <br />rented and the area is needed for them. <br />OLD BUSINESS - Public Hearings <br />PUD-84-13, Castlewood Properties <br />Roger Manning, represented Castlewood Properties, 205-F Main <br />Street, Pleasanton for Art Dunkley who was out of town. He <br />explained that the number of units has been reduced from 84 to 80 <br />and the park is now for 3.76 acres vs the 3.46 acres. Council <br />conditioned the project that the City not be charged an increase <br />in dollars for the park site added. Commissioner Innes asked if <br />this plan eliminated the walk through from Vineyard Avenue. Mr. <br />Manning said they did. Mr. Manning indicated the developer had <br />no strong feeling for the walkthrough one way or the other but <br />the homeowners definitely did not want one and it was eliminated <br />by the City Council. Commissioner Wilson asked the location of <br />the four units which are being removed. Mr. Manning explained <br />that there are five buildings for 80 units in this plan. He <br />indicated that the plan depicting the 76 units was the desire of <br />the surrounding homeowners and that 80 was a compromise. <br />Commissioner Wilson then asked how the cost of the park site was <br />determined. Mr. Harris explained. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Lindsey, seconded by <br />Commissioner Wellman that the plan as approved for City Council <br />under Case PUD-84-13 be approved and that a report go to City <br />Council in support of the revised plans. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES: Commissioners Innes, <br />Chairman Doherty <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br />Lindsey, Wellman, Wilson and <br />Resolution No. 2597 was entered and adopted supporting the <br />revised development plan for PUD-84-13 as approved by City <br />Council at their meeting of January 22, 1985. <br />- 2 - <br />` T <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.