Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes <br />Planning Commission <br />November 12, 1986 <br />was not so aware, but there are people continually stopping in <br />front of her house. <br />Vice Chairman Innes stated that everyone on Foothill Road has <br />similar traffic problems, and that people are always cruising <br />private streets. <br />Ms. Schorno urged the Commission to require the additional <br />landscaping be done by the developer on Foothill Road as <br />requested by the staff. <br />The public hearing was closed. <br />Vice Chairman Innes gave a background of the development over the <br />last four years. He suggested that the new residents of the area <br />form a homeowners association in an effort to keep the traffic in <br />the area down. <br />Vice Chairman Innes stated that the front of the area of <br />development looks like a disaster. Mr. Swift explained the area <br />of the road that was set aside for street widening and the <br />resulting effects. <br />Commissioner Michelotti felt there would be traffic problems <br />until the homes are all sold, with or without a trailer. She <br />felt strongly about the applicant landscaping the front of the <br />development. It will enhance the property. <br />Commissioner Michelotti felt there would be traffic problems <br />until the homes are all sold, with or without a trailer. She <br />felt strongly about the applicant landscaping the front of the <br />development. It will enhance the property, and give something <br />back to the homeowners <br />Commissioners Wellman and Berger felt the landscape in front to <br />be crucial, and she could support a trailer for three months or <br />until the first unit is ready as traffic will not be different <br />one way or the other. <br />Vice Chairman Innes recommended that Warmington be required to <br />put some type of temporary signage in front of the lot three from <br />the trailer so that the cars going into the home will be least <br />obtrusive. It is not fair to impose this parking situation on <br />the current occupant. He could support use of the trailer until <br />the first home is finished, and additional landscaping on the <br />front of the project site. <br />Commissioner Wellman asked whether or not signing would have to <br />be submitted under separate application. Mr. Swift answered that <br />it does not have to be separate. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Michelotti seconded by <br />Commissioner Berger that all findings shown on the staff report <br />are made and that Case UP-86-45 be approved subject to the <br />conditions shown in the staff report with the following changes: <br />- 5 - <br />