PC 10/08/86 - Laserfiche WebLink

Minutes Planning Commission October 8, 1986 Mr. Combs intends to continue living on site. Mr. Combs does not agree that a lot line should be put through the middle of his barn. Commissioner Hoyt said he is uncomfortable with applicants who have an approved development plan and then ask the City to skirt around it. Mr. Hirst explained that Mr. Combs does not want the lot line to go through the barn. Mr. Hirst acknowledged that Lot 7 as shown on the proposed plan has admittedly little less depth than what the City would require for a 20,000 sq. ft. lot, but calculated from the center of the lot is pretty close. He didn't feel this would be the first time a PUD was approved with this kind of lot configuration. Commissioner Michelotti asked if the application was approved with six lots, leaving number five in the center of the entire length, could the applicant come back and reaply for another lot. Mr. Swift said that he could. Commissioner Wellman discussed changing the lot line on No. 7 and whether or not it would affect No. 3. Mr. Swift stated staff recommends the lot line be moved further to the west. Commissioner Wellman asked how changing Lot No. 2 would affect the existing residence. Mr. Hirst said the fencing would have to be completely rearranged. This would be a considerable expense to the applicant. He didn't recall off hand if there were any trees that would have to be removed or worked around. Mr. Hirst indicated that the proposed arrangement is to accommodate Combs for the rest of his life. Commissioner Berger indicated that the major difference appears to be six salable lots vs five as recommended by staff. Mr. Hirst presented the Skinner proposal. Mr. Skinner has modified his layout. He has reoriented his lots to front on Mohr Avenue. He has made considerable changes in the flag lot to accommodate a driveway. Mr. Hirst did not believe the Skinner proposal creates any "cookie cutter" lots. The lots are not all the same and their proposal does conform to the approved PUD. Joe Gaffney, Bissell & Karn, discussed circulation. He indicated that it was avoid a narrow flag lot approach to his concerned with moving a lot line around The public hearing was closed. the Combs property, and the desire of Mr. Combs to ranch. Mr. Combs is a well house. Commissioner Berger indicated that concerning the Skinner property, she has no objections to the original submittal from the applicant. She did, however, have a problem with the Combs proposal. Staff's option retains the integrity of the original ranch and allows for future development. She agrees with Commissioner Hoyt. Commissioner Hoyt said he has no problem with the Skinner presentation. He agrees with the staff concerning the Combs property. - 7 - __ _ _ _..-_. ____ _ _ T