PC 09/03/86 - Laserfiche WebLink

Minutes of the Continued Planning Commission Meetinq of 8/27/86 Held on 9/3/86 favor of it. He indicated some confusion to the staff's proposal. Commissioner Michelotti asked staff about development with no limit of 150% under the PUD. Mr. Lee said that if 270 acres are Low Density Residential up to 540 units could be constructed. Mr. Lee indicated that the 25% slope limitation applies in Rural Density but not under Low Density Residential. If the proposed General Plan is put in place and the development comes under a PUD, it could be developed under Low Density Residential. Mr. Swift pointed out that this entire property is not shown in Low Density Residential, it is shown Low Density Residential and Open Space. Commissioner Innes asked how many units could be developed in the existing General Plan. Mr. Lee said with 48 acres Low Density Residential times two units would allow 96 units. Mr. Swift indicated that with a density bonus one could get 2 1/2 units per acre. Discussion then ensued with development under other densities as well as the Community Facilities Alternative. Commissioner Michelotti asked if the demarcation proposed was a result of the 670' line. Mr. Lee indicated that it was. 2C - Moller Mr. Lee reviewed the General Plan proposal. No property owner or representative addressed this issue. 2D - Beratlis Mr. Lee presented the proposed General Plan designation of Community Facilities Alternative which recommends Rural Density Residential. Bill Hirst, 235 Main Street, presented the history of the property, including membership in a water and sewer assessment district. The property is owned by several families none of whom agree with staff's proposal. Mr. Hirst said they have filed with the City a PUD application which they feel confident can deal with various concerns expressed by staff. Mr. Hirst then distributed an exhibit to the Commissioners with his proposal. Commissioner Innes, Mr. Lee and Mr. Hirst then discussed the development possibilities under different densities. 2E - Currin Mr. Lee indicated that there is a 55 unit proposal submitted to Alameda County at this time. No one addressed this item. - 5 - __ .., _ - _ ..r.-.__.. ..~__ .. ..- _ _.. _». r.