My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 06/11/86
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1986
>
PC 06/11/86
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2017 11:05:26 AM
Creation date
4/23/2007 4:18:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/11/1986
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 06/11/86
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
added, fire and police response time will be increased and <br />the City is facing Proposition 4 spending limitations which will <br />have to be voted on by the public. The Planning Commission has <br />been approving projects on the assumption that they would be <br />self-supporting. If this is not the case the Planning Commission <br />should know about it. <br />Commissioner Michelotti also expressed concern about the budget <br />and the discrepancies in the required staff of the city and <br />available monies to provide it. She indicated that some solution <br />to rectify this problem must be found and pointed out that <br />Pleasanton's population had increased by 10,000 in the past four <br />years in addition to 17,000 in-commuters, where Pleasanton used <br />to be an out-commuter city. There is now a different type of <br />population and the police are experiencing different types of <br />problems. If the Planning Commission is responsible for <br />approving projects, then we have to know that the services are <br />going to be provided. <br />Commissioner Lindsey indicated that the Commission would be <br />overstepping its bounds to suggest it should approve or deny the <br />city budget. Commissioner Innes agreed it is not within their <br />scope, but feels the Commission needs to know the fiscal facts <br />regarding levels of service for administration, public safety, <br />etc. <br />After further discussion, a motion was made by Commissioner <br />Innes, seconded by Commissioner Hoyt, that the City Manager <br />designate someone to make a presentation of the approved budget <br />at the meeting following approval of the budget by the City <br />Council. This matter was approved unanimously. <br />OLD BUSINESS - Public Hearings <br />PUD-86-1, Adams/Combs/Skinner <br />Application of Earl Adams, Robert Combs, and William skinner for <br />development plan approval for a 17 unit single-family residential <br />development, to be located on an approximately 1o acre site <br />located approximately 400 feet west of Martin Avenue between Mohr <br />Avenue and Cameron Avenue. Zoning for the property is PUD <br />(Planned Unit Development)-Los Density Residential District. <br />This item was continued to 6/25/86. <br />PUD-80-14M/PUD-82-1-iM, Reynolds and Brown <br />Application of Reynolds and Brown to amend conditions of approval <br />governing development of Pleasanton Park, an industrial <br />commercial development located northwest of Hopyard Road and <br />Owens Drive to allow maximum building floor area within the site <br />to exceed 40%. <br />This item was withdrawn from the agenda. <br />- 2 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.