My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 02/19/86
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1986
>
PC 02/19/86
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2017 11:06:20 AM
Creation date
4/20/2007 4:38:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/19/1986
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 2/19/86
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Minutes <br />Planning Commissioi. <br />2/19/86 <br />participating in the Mutual Benefit District described through a <br />Prudential Insurance Company of America roster. The map shows <br />the properties along Santa Rita Road which are exempt and they <br />are included. Mr. Swift stated that Callahan Pentz did the <br />improvements as part of an improvement agreement and asked that <br />they be reimbursed from a Mutual Benefit District. This only <br />covers the curbs, gutters and street improvements that hadn't <br />been done by Adams and Madden. This development should be <br />included. Chairman Wilson said this project should only be <br />responsible for frontage portion of the property. Mr. Swift <br />stated that this is not part of the North Pleasanton Improvement <br />District but something totally different. <br />Mr. Chapman presented the colors and materials proposed to be <br />used. He stated the ceramic the is proposed for the complete <br />building, not just one elevation as is done in other cases. The <br />drawings are in error with regard to depicting the fence. This <br />will be changed to have enamel paint to match the ceramic tile. <br />John Law, Ad Art Signs, addressed the signing portion of this <br />application. Staff wants to do away with wall signing entirely. <br />Doing away with all wall signing would be detrimental to the use <br />of the storage facility. Commissioner Innes asked why if a <br />monument sign is approved, wall signs are needed. Commissioner <br />Innes asked the applicant to point out the location of the <br />monument signing. The applicant complied. Commissioner Lindsey <br />asked the size of the monument sign. Commissioner Innes <br />responded that it appears to be 10'x7'. <br />Lee Reid, the developer of the project, indicated he would be <br />happy to answer any questions posed by the Commission. They did <br />marketing surveys and determined the area could support a <br />mini-storage facility such as this. He stated he is not new to <br />the area and in fact owns the warehouse building across the <br />street which houses the gymnasium in it. Commissioner Innes <br />asked Mr. Reid if he has other facilities like this. Mr. Reid <br />indicated he does not. Regarding the parking ratios, they used <br />the services of a consulting firm which has gathered data from <br />many sources. The hours of access have not yet been established, <br />but they will probably be 7:OOam-7:OOpm. <br />Mr. Chapman spoke again addressing signs. They would be willing <br />to reduce the sign to a more agreeable size. <br />The public hearing was closed. <br />Chairman Wilson asked if the Fire Department can maneuver around <br />the turns. Mr. Swift stated that they can make the turn. <br />Chairman Wilson asked if this matter has been cleared with the <br />Fire department. Mr. Swift said it has been. Chairman Wilson <br />discussed paving over the easement. Mr. Swift stated the City <br />has no problem with paving. The questions is building a wall <br />across the easement. Mr. Swift said there is a problem, however, <br />with the signing proposed as there is a 10' sign within 16' which <br />only gives 3' to the sidewalk and to the building and staff feels <br />this is a little too large for the area for which it is proposed. <br />- 3 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.