PC 02/12/86 - Laserfiche WebLink

Minutes Planning Commissio._ 2/12/86 the interchange is completed. Mr. Callahan responded that it depends on the sites which are developed. Chairman Wilson asked if it was anticipated that with AT&T Hopyard Road will have to go to four lanes, or is it anticipated it might not happen because of the completion of the Stoneridge and other interchanges. Mr. Callahan said this is correct. They have been pushing for the completion of Stoneridge/I-680 for community benefit. Personally he does not believe any of the interim traffic mitigation measures will be necessary. He concurred with Mr. Swift's recommended revision because it allows the condition to remain open until occupancy takes place. Commissioner Michelotti asked about the signal at Tassajara and I-580 westbound off ramps. Mr. Callahan indicated they are in the process of working with Caltrans at the current time. In discussing the revised plan, Mr. Swift suggested that perhaps Conditions 1 through 6 can be collapsed with respect to the revised site plan. Revise Condition No. 1 to say the "revised site plan", which takes care of those; the other condition would be Condition No. 15 that Hopyard/Owens Improvements be interim and done at the time it is deemed necessary by the City Engineer and that these be bonded for both the installation and removal at the time building permits are taken out for AT&T. Chairman Wilson indicated that items 1 through 6 are now taken care of with submission of the new site plan. Tom Quaglia indicated No. 10 would stay a condition of approval. Commissioner Lindsey discussed the parking structure. Mr. Quaglia indicated that in the project conclusion it was alluded to that they would encourage use of parking but did not place this on a specific condition. Commissioner Innes asked if the staff was in agreement with the placement of the four acres of new open space shown in the revised plan (spread around the project),or whether it should be grouped into one area. Mr. Swift suggested that if the Planning Commission is comfortable with all other aspect of the projects, parking, height of the buildings, architecture, entry driveways, etc. that they direct staff to work with the developer to try and revise the landscaping. Perhaps the Commission would like to direct staff as to whether they would like to see it in berms or along the roadway or clumped into a more usable three or four acre portion of the project. Commissioner Wellman asked if another condition is being proposed that the developer work with the staff for providing the new landscaping. Mr. Swift indicated they are going to revise the site plan to handle the elimination of five hundred spaces in a more efficient way already. Perhaps at the continued meeting next Wednesday, this could be brought back for review. He asked if the Commission to take action on the project so that the staff can be directed as to whether or not they are on the right track. Chairman Wilson likes to have the open space as shown while acknowledging that it is not exact. He further indicated he saw no need for this to come back before the Planning Commission. If the staff has a real problem with it, then they can schedule it for Planning Commission review. - 13 - ~_.