Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes <br />Planning Commission <br />3/2/587 <br />monthly rents. Chairman Lindsey felt with the amenities <br />provided, he could support he project. <br />Conditions <br />Commissioner Innes agreed with the presentation of the noise <br />consultant, that causing the developer to pay for windows because <br />of the impacts of helicopter noise is out of line. A sign should <br />be posted in the development showing tenants that the development <br />is in a helicopter path but he didn't feel the noise would be any <br />greater than that of automobiles. He would suggest condition No. <br />3, therefore, be deleted. <br />Commissioner Innes discussed Condition No. 13. The traffic is <br />light but studies show a signal will be needed at build out. He <br />felt a lot of people in the future would be contributing to this <br />signal and this development's share should be based upon their <br />impact to that intersection. He felt there share should not be <br />50% but rather a lesser amount based upon their contribution to <br />the impact (probably 4-5%). <br />Commissioner Innes felt Condition No. 12 should be as shown in <br />Deborah Castle's letter to the Commission. <br />Traffic <br />Commissioner Innes asked staff if they were satisfied with the <br />explanations given at the podium relative to the inconsistencies <br />of traffic figures. Mr. Swift said there figures do not work at <br />all intersections. Normally staff does not look at existing <br />counts because they are not important. The future projections <br />don't look out of line on critical intersections. Mr. Swift <br />again stated that there are no standard traffic assumptions for <br />high density residential development in the City. <br />Chairman Lindsey said one thing which can be done is to continue <br />this matter until the traffic studies have been corrected. <br />Commissioner Inner said the studies can be corrected between the <br />time of this Planning Commission meeting and the schedule of City <br />Council. Mr. Swift said this could work, and if the critical <br />columns change, the entire project could be brought back before <br />the Planning Commission for review. The Commissioners agreed <br />unanimously to this solution. <br />Commissioner Michelotti expressed distress at the redistributed <br />figures, getting through the maze, and getting the computer on <br />line. On the other hand the City is trying to get housing for <br />people who will be close to Valley Memorial Hospital .and Hacienda <br />Business Park. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Berger, seconded by <br />Commissioner Hoyt that approval of Case PUD-87-3 would have an <br />insignificant effect on the environment. <br />- 10 - <br />