PC 06/22/88 - Laserfiche WebLink

location. He showed overlays of the different lots that were in discussion and elaborated about each individual one. He stressed that the homeowners have tried very hard to create attractive homes and felt they would do everything possible to comply. Chairman Michelotti asked if he was in agreement with Option 4 recommended in the staff report. Mr. Stern wasn't sure which option it was, but felt it appropriate for the fences to go back to the original setback. Commissioner Mahern asked Mr. Stern if in talking about the original setback he meant 7'. He said he meant 7' setback plus the 3` back of the curb. Commissioner Tarver asked Mr. Swift if it was the intention of Option 4 to say if there was a landscape and maintenance plan that the Design Review Hoard should review every fence application to see how it fits in with the neighborhood and also have a landscape plan. Mr. Swift clarified Option 4 for Commissioner Tarver. Mr. Stern stated that he felt each home owner is different and had a different situation and felt they should be treated accordingly. Herb Singleton, 2247 Martin Ave. expressed his concerns about the project. He did not like the way the curbs were done. He said 20 people had been contacted about a petition and 18 had signed it in order to maintain a 25' setback. Two other people did not disagree but chose not to sign the petition. These people simply signed the petition for their feeling for the neighborhood and their properties were not directly involved. He was asking the Commission to do what was best for the entire neighborhood. He felt a maintenance agreement as once discus$ed would be difficult to administer. He felt future homeowners should be instructed regarding the CCScR's so they would know what was allowed. Chairman Michelotti reminded him that was the developer's responsibility. Terri Johnson, ,:x611 Cameron Avenue, stated that she was appalled at the petition that Mr. Singleton had passed around. She thought it gave incorrect inf ormation and read a portion of the petition. Ken Hrokaw, 1712 Martin, Lot 17, stated that he has read a paper from the Planning and Community Development which gives the guidelines for planting and landscaping. He stated that he agreed with these guidelines. He said his biggest problem as a homeowner was that he had a corner lot facing Martin Ave. He felt a 10' setback was appropriate and would agree to landscape that area within 90 days if this is what was agreed upon. He favored a 45 degree angle and landscaping as shown on the rendering. Page 7