My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 11/22/88
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1988
>
PC 11/22/88
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2017 11:22:23 AM
Creation date
4/13/2007 2:38:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/22/1988
DOCUMENT NAME
PC112288
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Tarver wondered if ~4UC~ per unit was sufficient. <br />Chairman Michelotti asked if the City has considered changing <br />the :~4c~G pal2cy. Mr. Swift said it has not been considered <br />since 1978. <br />Discussion ensued as to what other cities collect for housing <br />needs. <br />Commissioner Tarver suggested that staff look into what is <br />appropriate and come back with a recommendation. He felt the <br />consensus kaas that :~4~JC3 per unit was not enough to achieve the <br />desired results. <br />Mr. Swift felt it would be better to delay this until the City <br />lao~.s at the Housing Element which is programmed for the near <br />future. <br />Chairman Michelotti suggested that the Commission schedule a <br />meeting to discuss the topic of affordable housing and how to <br />actually obtain it. She noted that Commissioner Mahern, Tarver, <br />and herself had attended a meeting with a group from <br />St. Augustine Church. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Mahern, seconded by Chairman <br />Michelotti to recommend approval of the {Negative Declaration <br />prepared for Case GF'-88-7 as approval of this project would have <br />an insignificant effect on the environment; finding that the <br />proposed General Plan amendment is consistent with the goals and <br />policies of the General Plan, and recommending approval of Case <br />GF'-88-7 to amend the Hausinq Element of .the General Plan. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE: <br />AYES: Commissioners Hovingh, Mahern, Tarver, and <br />Chairman Michelotti <br />NOES: None <br />AFiSENT: Commissioner E~erger and Hoyt <br />ABSTAIN: None <br />Resolution No. PC-88-127 was entered and adapted approving of <br />the Negative Declaration for Case GP-88-7 as motioned. <br />Resolution No. PC-88-128 was entered and adopted recommending <br />approval of Case GP-SB-7 as motioned. <br />MATTERS_FOR_COMMISSIDN=S_REVIEW <br />a. Signal Phasing, Santa Rita Road/West Las Positas Boulevard <br />Mr. Swift presented <br />needed. <br />an informational report. <br />No action was <br />F'age 1 ~~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.