Laserfiche WebLink
buildings and felt this was going to affect traffic dramatically <br />in the future. <br />Di5cu5sion ensued between staff and the Commission regarding <br />1 evel s of traf f i c i n the peal: hours. <br />Commissioner Hovingh said he Iiked the project. He felt the <br />Commission should become more adamant as to the type of <br />buildings they wished to see constructed in the future. He <br />thought underground parking should also be considered in the <br />future. He said he could support the project. <br />Chairman Michelotti commended the architect and developer. She <br />was particularly pleased with the landscaping. She also <br />e::pressed concern regarding traffic increase. However, as a <br />whole she felt the project is an asset to Pleasanton. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Hovingh, seconded by <br />Commissioner Mahern recommending approval of Case FUD-8~?-~-iilJ <br />subject to the conditions of the staff report, and modifying <br />Condition No. iL allowing for mare fle:cibility. <br />ROLL_CALL_VOTE <br />AYES: Commissioners Hovingh, Mahern, Tarver, and <br />Chairman Michelotti <br />NQES: None <br />AE+SENT: Commissioners 5erger and Hoyt <br />RHSTAIN: None <br />Fesolution No. PC-88-i~b was entered and adopted recommending <br />approval of Case F'UD-84~-2-11D as motioned. <br />GP_-88_71_City_of_Pleasanton <br />Application to amend the Housing Element of the General Plan to <br />require each residential project to include its prorate share, <br />of low- and moderate-income housing needs or to contribute an <br />in-lieu fee, or to make any other revision deemed in the public <br />interest. <br />Mr. Swift <br />Commission <br />consistent <br />approve Ca <br />F'1 an . He <br />policies in <br />presented the staff <br />find the proposed <br />wi tt-i the goal s and p <br />se GP-88-7 to amend the <br />added tl'iat the City <br />the near future. <br />report recommending that the <br />General Plan Amendment is <br />~I i ci es of the General F1 an and <br />Housing Element of the General <br />would be reviewing all housing <br />The public hearing was opened. <br />No one represented the application. <br />The public hearing was closed. <br />Chairman Michelotti asked Mr. Swift how long ago the figure of <br />~4()C.~ per unit charged to the developer was set. Mr. Swift said <br />this Was set in 1978. <br />F'age 9 <br />