PC 11/09/88 - Laserfiche WebLink

Conrad Rickenbach, 4G? Arlington Ct., partner in the project, represented the application. He stated that he has reviewed the staff report and concurs with the conditions of the staff report as amended. The public hearing was closed. Commissioner Hovingh stated that he did not care for eucalyptus trees and would like to delete that on Sheet s of the landscape plan. Chairman Michelotti asked Mr. Swift to respond to Commissioner Hovingh's statement. Mr. Swift said that if the right kind of eucalyptus tree is planted he felt it would be appropriate. The other Commissioners feit the eucalyptus trees were appropriate. A motion was made by Commissioner Herger, seconded by Commissioner Hoyt to recommend approval of the Negative Declaration prepared for Case pUD-88-1~ as approval of this project would have an insignificant effect on the environment. ROLL CALL DOTE AYES: Commissioners Herger, Hovingh, Hoyt, Mahern, and Chairman Michelotti hlOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Commissioner Tarver Resolution No. pC-88-117 was entered and adopted recommending approval of the Negative Declaration prepared for Case pUD-88-1~ as motioned. A motion was made by Commissioner Herger, seconded by Commissioner Hoyt that the development plan is consistent with the General plan and the purposes of the pUD Ordinance; and recommends approval of the pUD Development plan for Case pUD-88-1~ subject to the conditions listed on Exhibit C: and amending Condition ba to say that the 3~' minimum setback be changed to 3G`; and amending Condition 6b by adding a ciause to not require berming if the same intent could be accomplished through the use of shrubs. ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: Commissioners Herger, Hovingh, Hoyt, Mahern, and Chairman Michelotti NOES: None ABSEhlT: None ABSTAIN: Commissioner Tarver Resolution No. pC-88-118 was entered and adopted recommending approval of Case pUD-88-12 as motioned. page