Laserfiche WebLink
Vanessa ha~~~~aihau asked if am potion of the Greenbrier bypass road «~ill Iie ~ isible <br />from public streets and referred to the specific plan. page -I9. Pat Costanzo ans~~~~ered <br />that the proposed de~~elopment is also reyuestine a chun~ae to the specific plan. ] Ic <br />said the proposed h} pass road is similar to the one that's going to the golf course. <br />Loris Tinli~~~ outlined the options currcntl} tieing considered: <br />Option .~ -Status Quo (no ne~~ road ) <br />Option l3 Road connecting to High~~a~ R4 <br />~)ph 011 ~ ~~rl~~Inal ahgnlllent_ Ill(~dlJled 111 Ah (ll'~ lillh ~~COIO~~~~ <br />Option D Bypass road associated «ith Greenbrier proposal <br />Mil:c Tassano stated that the best access route for (>ption B is ~~ia Little Valley Road <br />which runs north b< <he G.L. propert} and veers off. This road is currently limited to <br />private access but could he converted to a public road. ~~1ike passed around a <br />topographical map of this option and indicated any of these areas could he accessed <br />on the hlternet using "Google Earth'. <br />~'es Felton asked if the ~~olf course could still be accessed from i lapp} V'allr~_ ~ Road <br />with this option. Mike said it ~~ould not. <br />Jim Freitas asked ifa connection to Ftottinger v~'as considered an option. .~I Spotorno <br />indicated there ~~~~as no way around the can~~on. <br />Vanessa stated that studies were done in 1998 and 1909. There has been no nc~~ <br />information stating it ~~~as not possible to build the road. The study said it is possible. <br />just costly. The Cit} hasn~t pro~~ided information that it cant be built Lurie ~hinfo~~ <br />responded that the property o~~~~ner has said he doesn~t ~~ant to build it there and the <br />City probabl}~ will not lorce it. Vanessa indicated that condemnation is al«~avs an <br />option fur the Cite. Loris said the consensus of the committee in the prcviuus <br />meeting was that the committee ~~as not in Itivor of cundenu~atiun. <br />,fim I'reitas said the Spotorno~s arc already appro~~ed for 16 homes on the Ilat and <br />asked Al Spotorno if he ~~~ould considcrjust leaving it at that. ~~1 responded that he <br />has watched evcr~one split lots and have nee er complained about ~~~hat everyone else <br />~~as doing. ] le said he could onl~~ do «hat makes sense Iinanci~illy. Jim said that <br />nobody grants the homes and thaf s the bottom line. Bob 1\~~Iaund stated the committee <br />needed to be careful about linking the bypass road to the development as an <br />endorsement of the derclopment. Roger Manning asked if :11 currently has 10"? <br />homes approved. Loris Tinlol~~ ans«ered that he doesn't have 10_' homes that he can <br />put any~~-here. Pat COStanLO added that the current application saes they ~~ould like <br />to move the housing do~rn from the original location and the number ~~~cnt dov~n from <br />10'? to 79. Gene ,lordon said the road is beautiful. but it comes ~a ith a cost of a net of <br />7'? homes that the area residents ~rould have to lip-e with. } Ie helieres the committee <br />would need to consider accepting the status quo. Vanessa ha~raihau stated that 70°0 <br />of the floor area ratio is ~rhat's being proposed vrhich ~rould open it up for the City to <br />IIVBRC Minutes 08-10-06 <br />