My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
13
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
032007
>
REGULAR MEETING
>
13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2007 1:11:40 PM
Creation date
3/15/2007 12:51:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/20/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
13
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Pinrlk•o Drive Turnout and Pipeline Project Environrneretrd Checklist <br />16. UTILITIES AND SER [~ ICE SYSTEMS <br />Environmental Setting <br />The City of Pleasanton has public services and infrastnichlre planned to meet the build out of the <br />General Plan (1996), as implemented by the Growth Management Plan. <br />Standards of Significance <br />For purposes of this environmental document, an impact is considered significant if the proposed <br />project would: <br />• Result in the construction of new water facilities or expansion of existing facilities; <br />• Result in exceeding the wastewater treatment requirements of the Regional Water Quality <br />Control Board; <br />• Result in or require the construction or expansion of existing wastewater treatment <br />facilities; or <br />• Be served by a landfill that has inadequate permitted capacity. <br /> Less than <br />Potentially Significant Less than <br />Significant Wi[h Mitigation Significant No <br />tSSUeS Inmact Incornoratetl Imnnc[ Imnac[ <br />Utilities and Service Systems <br />Would the project: <br />a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the ~ ~ ~ `C <br />applicable Regional Water Quality Control <br />Board'? <br />b) Require or result in the construction of new water <br />or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of <br />existing facilities, the construction of which <br />could cause significant environmental effects'? <br />c) Require or resuh in the construction of new storm <br />water drainage facilities or expansion of existing <br />facilities, the construction of which could cause <br />significant environmental effects? <br />d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve <br />the project from existing entitlements and <br />resources, or are new or expanded entitlements <br />needed? <br />Discussion <br />a, b, c, d) No impact. The project will not place additional demands on public utilities or <br />services. No new utility systems arc necessary in relation to the project. "There will be <br />minima] construction debris generated during constntction. The project has no <br />appreciable bearing on storm water, wastewater treatment, or solid waste facilities or <br />City of Pleasanton 44 W inrlcr & Kelly <br />Draft Initial Study/Proposed Negative Declaration August 2006 <br />04263 ~ O l <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.