Laserfiche WebLink
<br />San Francisco Bay Area <br /> <br />Draft Regional Housing Needs Allocation, 41h Revision <br /> <br />As required by statute, ABAG will assign a share of the regional need to the San Mateo <br />subregion "in a proportion consistent with the distribution of households" in Projections <br />2007. The subregion is responsible for completing its own RHNA process that is parallel to, <br />but separate from, the regional RHNA process. The subregion will create its own <br />methodology, issue draft allocations, handle the revision and appeal processes, and then issue <br />final allocations to members of the subregion. <br /> <br />Although the subregion is working independently of the regional RHNA process, ABAG is <br />ultimately responsible for ensuring that all of the region's housing need is allocated. Thus, if <br />the subregion fails at any point in its attempt to develop a final RHNA allocation for the <br />subregion, ABAG must complete the allocation process for the members of the subregion. <br /> <br />In the event that the San Mateo subregion fails to complete the RHNA process, the HMC <br />recommends the methodology include the following guidelines for handling the allocation of <br />units to jurisdictions within the subregion: <br /> <br />I. If the members of the subregion adopts a "default allocation," ABAG will allocate using <br />the default allocation. A "default allocation" is the allocation which a member of the San <br />Mateo RHN A subregion receives if it '"opts out" of the subregion. <br />2. If the subregion fails before ABAG has made any allocation, ABAG combines the <br />subregional share with the rest of the regional need and allocates the total regional need <br />to the entire region using ABAG's RHNA methodology. <br />3. If the subregion fails after ABAG has made its initial allocation, ABAG separately <br />allocates the subregional share among only the members of the subregion. ABAG uses its <br />RHNA methodology to do so. <br /> <br />This approach is recommended by the HMC because it minImIZeS the extent of any <br />reallocations that could occur as a result of subregional failure and preserves the integrity of <br />the respective efforts of ABAG and C/CAG. Keeping San Mateo separated once ABAG has <br />completed its initial allocation also provides the most certainty to all jurisdictions about what <br />their allocation will be. <br /> <br />VI. Regional Projections <br /> <br />Every two years, ABAG produces a long-run regional forecast called Projections. The <br />Projections forecast provides specific information for population, households, employment and <br />other related variables. In Projections 2007, values are reported for year 2000, and then for each <br />five year increment to 2035. <br /> <br />Several related models are used to perform the forecast. The economic model balances demand <br />for the production of goods and services with the supply of productive capacity. The demographic <br />model uses birth rates, death rates and migration data to forecast future population using a <br />cohort-survival model. A great deal of data is required by the models, including information on <br />economic relationships and trends, population-related information like births, deaths and <br />migration, as well as land use and land use policy data. <br /> <br />Since Projections 2003, ABAG has assumed the "Network of Neighborhoods" land use pattern, <br />as developed through the Smart Growth Strategy/Regional Livability Footprint Project. This <br />pattern expects higher levels of housing production. It also assumes that an increasing proportion <br />of regional growth occurs near transit and in existing urban areas. In the Projections 2007 <br /> <br />November 2006, Page 15 <br />