My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
26
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
011607
>
REGULAR MEETING
>
26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2007 11:57:11 AM
Creation date
1/11/2007 3:26:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
1/16/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
26
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />San Francisco Bay Area <br /> <br />Draft Regional Housing Needs Allocation, 4th Revision <br /> <br />I. Transfer requests must have at least two willing partners and the total number of units <br />within the group requesting the transfer cannot be reduced. <br />2. Transfers must include units at all income levels in the same proportion as initially <br />allocated. <br />3. All members of the transfer group must retain some allocation of very low and low <br />income units. <br />4. The proposed transfer must include a specifically defined package of incentives and/or <br />resources that will enable the jurisdiction(s) receiving an increased allocation to provide <br />more housing choices than would otherwise occur absent the transfer and the <br />accompanying incentives or resources. <br />5. If the transfer results in a greater concentration of very low or low income units in the <br />receiving jurisdiction, the effect must be offset by findings by the members of the transfer <br />group that address the RHNA objectives. For example, the findings might include (a) <br />there is such an urgent need for more housing choices in those income categories that the <br />opportunity to effect more housing choices in these categories offsets the impacts of <br />over-concentration, or (b) the package of incentives and/or resources are for mixed <br />income projects, or (c) the package of incentives and/or resources are for "transitional" <br />housing for very low or low income households being relocated for rehabilitation of <br />existing very low or low income units, or (d) the package of incentives and/or resources <br />are for additional units that avoid displacement or "gentrification" of existing <br />communities. <br />6. For the transfer of very low and low income units, there are restrictions that ensure the <br />long-term affordability of the transferred units. <br />7. Transfers must comply with all other statutory constraints and be consistent with the <br />RHNA objectives. <br /> <br />In addition to guaranteeing that transfers meet the RHNA statutory objectives, these criteria <br />promote regional policies to increase housing supply and provide more housing choices. The <br />criteria state that the transfer must include the resources necessary to improve housing <br />choices and, specifically, in a way that would not otherwise be possible without the transfer. <br />The long-term affordability restrictions on very low and low income transferred units ensure <br />that these units will contribute to a fundamental increase in affordable housing choices. <br /> <br />The criteria also emphasize development of affordable units and are therefore consistent with <br />the state RHNA objective that every jurisdiction does its "fair share" to provide affordable <br />housing. The requirement that jurisdictions must retain some very low and low income units <br />and the stipulation that transfers must maintain the same income distribution as is initially <br />allocated ensure that a jurisdiction cannot abdicate its responsibility to provide affordable <br />units. The criteria also ensure that the benefits created by the transfer outweigh any possible <br />negative effects of an over-concentration of lower income households. <br /> <br />5. Subregions <br /> <br />The County of San Mateo, in partnership with all twenty cities in the county, has formed a <br />subregion, as allowed by state statute. The subregion has designated the City/County <br />Association of Governments (C/CAG) as the entity responsible for coordinating and <br />implementing the subregional RHNA process. <br /> <br />November 2006, Page 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.