Laserfiche WebLink
Resolution No. PC-89-109 <br />Page 5 - 12/13/89 <br />7. The applicant shall be responsible for the design of a <br />traffic signal for the intersection of Stoneridge Drive <br />and Kamp Drive. As part of the tract improvements the <br />applicant shall install all necessary conduits and pull <br />boxes for the future traffic signal. <br />8. The interim and ultimate typical sections for Stoneridge <br />Drive may be revised to increase the separation between <br />the sidewalk and the face of curb in ultimate <br />configuration to 5 feet, either by reducing landscaping <br />behind the walk or by narrowing the median. The <br />effective soundwall height on these typical sections <br />shall be a minimum of 8.5 feet above both rear yard <br />elevations and street grade. <br />9. All landscaping irrigation on Stoneridge Drive shall be <br />designed such that when Stoneridge Drive is widened only <br />a minimum amount of modification will be necessary. <br />10. The final landscape plan for Stoneridge Drive shall <br />reflect a preliminary plan designed by the City; said <br />City plan shall be designed in a time frame sufficient <br />to allow inclusion of final landscape plans in the <br />developer's final tract improvement plans. <br />11. The applicant shall construct interim street <br />improvements on Stoneridge Drive, substantially as shown <br />on the tentative tract plans, to the satisfaction of the <br />City Engineer to effect a smooth transition from the <br />existing two lane road westerly of the development to <br />the four lane divided roadway proposed for the <br />development. <br />12. The typical section for Kamp Drive shall be revised to <br />show a 5 foot wide monolithic sidewalk and a 5 foot wide <br />planter area behind the walk. <br />13. Street "D" in front of lots 70-72 shall be redesigned to <br />eliminate the parking "bay" and to allow sufficient <br />width to allow southbound right turn movements as well <br />as parking in front of all lots except lot 70; any <br />adjustment of street width shall not result in a <br />reduction in the number of lots in the subdivision. <br />14. The project shall be developed consistent with all the <br />recommendations contained in the Engeo Inc. report dated <br />March 9, 1989, Stoneridge Place Geotechnical <br />Exploration. <br />-5- <br />