My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:271
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:271
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/29/2006 12:32:18 PM
Creation date
11/29/2006 12:14:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
12/5/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:271
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />lines for the then production homes, Condition of Approval No. 17 of PUD-99-07 required the <br />project developer to submit a material and color palette consistent with the design standards of <br />the Happy Valley Specific Plan for approval by the City Council before approval of the first de- <br />sign review application for the home covered this development. <br />Donald BabbittlHeartwood Communities is now the developer of this 12-lot custom home <br />community. Mr. Babbitt has submitted detailed design guidelines for this 12-lot community, <br />named Serenity at Callippe Preserve. <br /> <br />THE PROPOSED MODIFICATION <br /> <br />The applicant requests a major modification to the approved PUD to: <br /> <br />I, Approve the new design guidelines for Heartwood Communities for a custom home de- <br />velopment to replace the 1999 design guidelines for production homes. Design guide- <br />lines for the 12 custom lots include written text with diagrams, photographs, and draw- <br />ings, providing clear, concise direction for the future individual homeowners at the Se- <br />renity at Callippe Preserve development. These guidelines will supersede the approved <br />production home design guidelines. <br /> <br />2, Delete Condition of Approval No.17 of PUD-99-07, thus modifYing the design review <br />process from the City Council to the Zoning Administrator level review process, follow- <br />ing standard City procedures, The applicant also proposes a 20-day notification and ap- <br />peal period, <br /> <br />3. Design Review approval for Lot No.8, serving as an example for the development. <br /> <br />ANALYSIS <br /> <br />Proposed Design Guidelines <br /> <br />The proposed design guidelines are very similar to those of Mariposa Ranch at Callippe Pre- <br />serve, The design criteria contained in the proposed design guidelines are detailed and compre- <br />hensive, The guidelines include the setbacks, building height, and floor area ratio for the devel- <br />opment, and they also cover the recommended architectural styles, landscaping, fencing, etc. <br />Details of architectural elements such as dormers, shutters, bay windows and roofline will assist <br />the homeowners and their design teams in making a successful transition from guideline state- <br />ments to physical designs. Staff believes that the proposed guidelines would provide compre- <br />hensive direction to the future homeowners regarding the designs of their homes. <br /> <br />SR:06:271 <br />Page 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.