Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2. Modity the design review process from the City Council to the Zoning Administrator <br />level review process, following standard City procedures. The applicant does propose a <br />20-day notification and appeal time, <br /> <br />3. Design Review approval for Lot No.8. <br /> <br />IV. ANALYSIS <br /> <br />1. Proposed Design Guidelines <br /> <br />The proposed design guidelines are very similar to the design requirements of Mariposa Ranch <br />at Callippe Preserve. The design criteria contained in the proposed design guidelines are de- <br />tailed and comprehensive. The guidelines include the setbacks, building height, and floor area <br />ratio for the development and it also covers the recommended architectural styles, landscaping, <br />fencing, etc. The detail of architectural elements, such as dormers, shutters, bay windows, roof- <br />line, etc" showing in the design guidelines ensures the homeowners and their design team's suc- <br />cessful translation from guideline statements to physical designs. Staff believes that the pro- <br />posed guidelines would provide this comprehensive level of detail and direction to the future <br />homeowners regarding all aspects ofthe designs of their homes. <br /> <br />The proposed design guidelines would replace the existing approved 1999 guidelines for PUD- <br />99-07, The Planning Commission action is to review, consider, and forward a recommendation <br />to the City Council for action, <br /> <br />Staff recommends that the following language be added to the design guidelines: <br /> <br />. Open fencing design should conform to the Uniform Building Code requirements <br />for fences around swimming pool, spa, etc, <br /> <br />Design Guidelines Review Procedures <br /> <br />The review of the home designs for these lots would be administered by a two-step process. <br /> <br />I. An "in-house" review conducted by the development's Design Review Board (DRB) to <br />ensure consistent to the design guidelines. The design plans would be approved by DRB <br />before being submitted to City staff for review. <br /> <br />2, After receipt of the DRB approval, the proposal would then be reviewed by City stafffol- <br />lowing the review procedures set forth in Section 18.20 of the Pleasanton Municipal <br />Code, <br /> <br />Case No. PUD-99-07-03M/PDR-579 <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />Planning Commission <br />