SR 06:242 - Laserfiche WebLink

mission staff rcport that the proposed PUD devclopmcnt plan conforms to the purposes of the PUD District, before taking action. VIII. PUBLIC COMMENT Public notices wcre sent to all property owners within a I,OOO-foot radius of the project site and to all homeowners living in both phases of the Laguna Oaks development. Several neighbors have commented to staff. Summaries of the letters/emails from Larry and Joyce Messa (3464 Old Foothill Road), Sandeep Duggal and Ecna Duggal (8019 Jorgcnscn Lanc), and Christine Ellis (Prcsidcnt Laguna Oaks Homeowncr's Association) are discussed in the attached Planning Commission staff rcport, Additional comments received from Sandcep and Eena Duggal aftcr the Planning Commission hearing are attached, IX. FISCAL IMPACT Thc projcct developer will construct the required improvements to Foothill Road and Old Foot- hill Road to accommodate the proposed projcct. Where these improvements accommodate both thc project and thc Alviso Adobe Park project, the applicant will bc rcimburscd thc park's pro- rata share of these costs, As previously discussed, staff rccommcnds waiving thc In-Lieu Park Dcdication fees ifthc 22-acre open space area is dcdicatcd to thc City. The project devcloper will be required to pay all City development fees including school impact fees, The homes covered by this application would pay property taxes that would go to offsct thcir impact to City scrviccs including police, fire, support staff, ctc, X. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Environmental rcvicw for the proposcd projcct is covered by an Initial Study/Mitigatcd Negative Declaration (ISIMND), which is attached. The ISIMND and Noticc ofComplction (NOC) were scnt to the State Clcaringhouse ofthc Officc of Planning and Research on July 19th for its CEQA review pcriod, which endcd on August 25th, Staff bclicves that thc project-related impacts are mitigated, with thc mitigation measures incor- porated in thc project's design or referenced with conditions of approval, and that there would be no significant or unmitigated cnvironmental impact. Staff, therefore, belicvcs that the Miti- gated Ncgative Declaration can be issucd in conformance with the standards of the California Environmcntal Quality Act (CEQA), If the City Council concurs with this environmcntal as- sessment, it must make the finding that thc Mitigated Negativc Dcclaration is appropriatc prior to approving thc proposed project. SR 06:242 Page 12 of 14