My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:246
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:246
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2006 2:22:35 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:46:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
10/17/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:246
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Other projects along the Vineyard corridor also use well water to irrigate vineyards. <br /> <br />As proposed by GHC, the water well currently on Parcel C would continue to provide landscape <br />irrigation water for the City-owned open space Parcels C and D, and other street landscaping <br />within the project, even after the lot line adjustment. This well water would also be used for <br />landscape irrigation and related agricultural uses on the vineyard estate lot Parcel A, if the lot line <br />adjustment is approved. <br /> <br />GHC specifically seeks a lot line adjustment to transfer the water well and 2,658 square feet of <br />the City-owned Parcel C to the vineyard estate lot Parcel A because the investment to install and <br />maintain 15.6 acres of vineyards on Parcel A is not sustainable without a dedicated well water <br />source. GHC has advised that using City-supplied domestic potable water to irrigate the <br />vineyards is economically infeasible. GHC was also concerned that just a license to use the well <br />water would not provide the permanent well water source needed for the vineyards, as the rights <br />given under a license agreement may be revoked by the City. <br /> <br />Because of the legal right to immediately revoke a license, at the request of GHC (in order for <br />them to meet a State Department of Real Estate deadline), City staff amended the current April <br />2005 License and Landscaping Maintenance Agreement to give GHC a revocable license to use <br />the well water on Parcel C, pending the City Council's final decision on this lot line adjustment. <br />(Pursuant to the terms of that amendment, if the Council denies the lot line adjustment, the <br />Council may also revoke GHC's license to use the well water.) This amendment also includes <br />provisions which require that: (i) well water not be used for domestic purposes or private <br />landscaping for other parcels in Tract 7240; (ii) if GHC builds a well cover or other accessory <br />structure, it must comply with the requirements of PUD-OO-OI and the Pleasanton Municipal <br />Code; (iii) the City's domestic water must be protected from contamination by the well water; <br />and (iv) if well water usage counts against the City's Independent Quota for groundwater, then <br />GHC will pay any recharge fee and indemnify the City. These provisions would carry forward <br />and remain in place if the lot line adjustment is approved. <br /> <br />If the lot line adjustment is approved, the owner of the vineyard estate lot Parcel A will need to <br />take access to the water well by an un-paved access road, as well as install a pump, electrical <br />service, and pipes. As noted above, any well cover or accessory structure must comply with the <br />provisions of PUD-00-01 and the Pleasanton Municipal Code. The transfer of 2,658 square feet <br />from the City-owned open space Parcel C, and the construction of a well cover, and related <br />improvements, does not result in any net loss of open space, as Parcel C is within the Vineyard <br />District of the Specific Plan (not the Open Space District). Within the Vineyard District, <br />"unpaved service roadways" and "permanent irrigation facilities" are included within the <br />Development Standards. (See Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan, page 41.) Additionally, <br />because the area proposed to be transferred will be used for agricultural purposes, and not new <br />urban uses, no additional agricultural mitigation fee would be required for the proposed lot line <br />adjustment. (See Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan, page 48.) 0 <br /> <br />SR 06:246 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.