PC 10/25/89 - Laserfiche WebLink

Ear; t_ E<ay izc=gi onal F'arkc wou:L d bE ab'1 e to c~verri de wl-iat the Ci ty mi gl-at say _ Ha was conc ern Ed that a si tuati. on mi qht develop such as i r-a the A7. ameda Fai rgr ot_cnds where another governmental aq ency mi ght over-r-i de the G'i ty s desires _ He has req nested that he be i reel tided i n confer enc ES wi th East Bay Fiegi onal Par 4c , especial 1 y i n deal i ny wi. th easement i ssa_aes _ He has not rECei ved any c omm~a r~i.cati on on tl-ae5e matters_ He wondered 1-iow tl-a c= prey oni nq woa_ald affect any bui.ldir~g on Vineyard Avan ua=_ Mr~ _ 8wi f t rESp onded to his conc erns_ wi th respect to Vi neyar-d Aven uE ., the rEal i gnment of that road i s not a function of the park<_ ]:t appears that the City aoni.nq p2 an does havE a role in the park- dEVe1 opment , but i t would be a rni nor onE_ "The Ci ty Cour-ici 1 i nt Ends to nEgot i ate an agr eemerat wi th East Bay Fiegi onal Park: District whi c-h may possibly incl udE certain land uses tl--~at would give tt'ae Ci ty some additional control bEyond what the current law is_ At the present ti ma East Easy Park-: can override Ci ty G'ounci 2 position wi th respect to act i vi t i Es that wool d occur i n the par1~ _ Further' di sc ussi on En suEd as to what mi ght happen as a r'esul t of prey oni ng the si te_ Commi s~i on Er t~{or arm a>;p1 a3 ned to !"Ir _ !'•7o>c er-a that i t apps=ars that East Bay Reyi anal Parke has the abi 1 i ty at the pr es Ent t i mE to do any of the neq, ati ve things di scuss ed i f they would choosE to da so_ Chaff rman Irli chel otti sug gent ed that i'~Ir _ Mo>;en tal kc ft..art her with the G'i.tY Manager about his conc erns_ Mr _ Mo>; on said hE thought the Gi. ty sh o~el d takes a position that woa_al d al 1 ow them mare c-ontrol over acti vi. ti es and level ailment o-f the par kc ~ and that the F'2 anni ng Commi ssi on sl-ioul d bE a part of that _ A motion was made by Commi ssi on er Mah ern ~ seconded by Chaff rman Mi c.hel otti. rEC Ommer~d i.nq approval off the Neg ati vE Dec 7.ar ati on prepared for Case R'L-~89--2 Y i nasmucti as pro_-jECt ail pr-oval wool d havE i r~si gni f i c-ant ad ver-se Ef f-ect on the snuff ron merit , and that 246 acre EBE<h='D pr op Erty be pr E~.oned to tt.e: "P•' LF+ublic and Insti tuti on a2 ) Di str-i ct, in conf or mancE with the G'i.tys General F'1 an , and rec ommendi. nq approval off Case RZ-89-11 _ FYOLL CALL ____VOTE AYEB. G:ommi ssi on ers BergEr , Horan , Hovi ngh , Mah Ern , and C:hai rman Mi chel ott i NOES: None A1E<SENT c IVone AE+STAINc IVone Pages 8